Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note on limit param in autoPagingToArray #2074

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Note on limit param in autoPagingToArray #2074

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

tvanantwerp
Copy link
Contributor

This change to the README.md file makes it more explicit that the limit value passed to autoPagingToArray is the limit for the total number of items that will be fetched from Stripe, and not a limit for the number of items retrieved per fetch during multiple rounds of fetching. The note about preventing runaway memory growth was suggestive of this behavior, but not entirely explicit.

Makes it more explicit that the `limit` value passed to `autoPagingToArray` is the limit for the total number of items that will be fetched from Stripe, and not a limit for the number of items retrieved per fetch during multiple rounds of fetching.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 29, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Contributor

@richardm-stripe richardm-stripe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Sorry for the confusion here.

Also added some comments to the code snippet below to hopefully clarify even further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants