-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 848
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get rid of ExternalAccount #417
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall I think this is a good change, as it eliminates the inconsistencies of the ExternalAccount
approach. Folks shouldn't be explicitly relying on that class anyway and, if they are, they can easily change from ExternalAccount
to ApiResource
.
$msg = "Bank accounts cannot be accessed without a customer ID or account ID."; | ||
throw new Error\InvalidRequest($msg, null); | ||
} | ||
$parentExtn = urlencode(Util\Util::utf8($parent)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It feels weird to encode so much knowledge about the URL structure in this object, but this is similar to, stripe-ruby, for example:
https://github.com/stripe/stripe-ruby/blob/master/lib/stripe/bank_account.rb
On the one hand, this leads to duplicated logic; on the other hand, it simplifies this object's dependencies and leads to more explicit tests.
Great implementation (with nice test additions!). I think others would have a better idea as to whether this is a desirable change or not, but the reduction in special casing seems like a good idea to me in concept at least. +1. |
lib/Account.php
Outdated
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ public function deauthorize($clientId = null, $opts = null) | |||
* @param array|null $params | |||
* @param array|string|null $opts | |||
* | |||
* @return ExternalAccount | |||
* @return ApiResource | |||
*/ | |||
public static function createExternalAccount($id, $params = null, $opts = null) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we remove those methods explicitly in favor of $account->external_accounts->create()
instead? This avoids the confusion and we would automatically return the right class based on the type of external accounts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, these methods let users manipulate external accounts without having to retrieve the account first (like other nested resource methods). Also, to clarify, these methods will return the correct type -- though of course we cannot know what this type will be in the PHPDoc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I've updated the PHPDoc to use BankAccount|Card
instead of ApiResource
.
lib/AlipayAccount.php
Outdated
@@ -7,7 +7,60 @@ | |||
* | |||
* @package Stripe | |||
*/ | |||
class AlipayAccount extends ExternalAccount | |||
class AlipayAccount extends ApiResource |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where are we on the idea that we should remove those classes entirely since we don't support them anymore and have not for over a year? Since PHP is dynamic and would return an ApiResource
anyway when you get one of those on a Charge for example, is it time to get rid of it at the same time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can keep the classes around -- the definitions do still exist in the OpenAPI spec, and in the case of Bitcoin some users do still send requests to the top-level endpoint /v1/bitcoin/receivers
.
I've removed the refund()
method from BitcoinReceiver
though, and updated the PHPDoc to include links to the sources API documentation.
lib/Card.php
Outdated
public static function retrieve($_id, $_opts = null) | ||
{ | ||
$msg = "Cards cannot be accessed without a customer, recipient or account ID. " . | ||
"Retrieve a bank account using \$customer->sources->retrieve('card_id'), " . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/bank account/card/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Thanks!
76ad07d
to
c6f5857
Compare
c6f5857
to
21381d6
Compare
Okay, since the consensus seems to be in favor, I'm going to pull this in the integration branch for v6. |
r? @brandur-stripe
cc @stripe/api-libraries
Okay, I'm not 100% sure we actually want this change, but since we're going to release a new major version I thought I'd open the PR to gather feedback.
This PR removes the
ExternalAccount
class entirely. The existing implementation has a number of flaws:instanceUrl()
method that assumes every external account can be attached to a customer, an account or a recipientverify()
method that assumes every external account can be verifiedBankAccount
has its ownverify()
methodSource
does not derive fromExternalAccount
This change makes the implementation closer to what we have in stripe-ruby and stripe-python: all "external accounts" (namely: cards, bank accounts, sources, Alipay accounts and Bitcoin receivers) derive directly from
APIResource
and have their owninstanceUrl()
method that knows which type of owner each resource can have (e.g. bank accounts cannot be attached to recipients, etc.), plus customretrieve()
andupdate()
methods that return an helpful error message.