Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4605 2 #87

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

4605 2 #87

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

manuq
Copy link
Contributor

@manuq manuq commented Aug 26, 2013

No description provided.

Manuel Quiñones and others added 4 commits August 22, 2013 13:14
Log an error instead.

Toolbar class was considering a value of None for the path, but the
ViewSource class wasn't.
In case of a GTK activity, it will display the source of
sugar-toolkit-gtk3 .  We can enhace this later, if we could check if
the activity is GTK2 or GTK3.  There is a FIXME note in the code for
this.

In case of a web activity, it will display sugar_web inside the
activity bundle.  The initial selected file will be env.js, which is
analog to the initial file env.py in sugar-toolkit-gtk3 .
A better option would be js/activity.js, but that implies bigger
changes in FileViewer class, and we are in freeze.
Replace glib import for GLib. This was breaking
the webaccount cpsection when running from latest
sugar-build.

Signed-off-by: Martin Abente Lahaye <tch@sugarlabs.org>
@manuq manuq mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2013
Closed
@tchx84
Copy link
Member

tchx84 commented Aug 26, 2013

I think there is a 4th (alien) patch there! I wonder why it says that it can be merged automatically, if shouldn't be able to, since that 4th patch is already in.

@manuq
Copy link
Contributor Author

manuq commented Aug 27, 2013

I think there is a 4th (alien) patch there! I wonder why it says that it can be merged automatically, if shouldn't be able to, since that 4th patch is already in.

Hey tch. This is what I did to make my repatches:

  • git checkout master
  • git pull <-- here it pulls your commit "Fix webaccount cpsection"
  • git checkout -b 4605-2
  • git rebase 4605
  • git rebase -i HEAD~2 <--- to improve my patches

So I think github / git will figure out the merge.

@dnarvaez dnarvaez closed this Sep 2, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants