This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP: Added wlr-workspace-unstable-v1.xml #35
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
WIP: Added wlr-workspace-unstable-v1.xml #35
Changes from 1 commit
0d270a1
96b2747
f2f73ed
097273d
b7e6880
5b959e8
65c0183
0a5f807
4738eae
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not define the dimensionality, be it 1D, 2D, etc. We need a second argument for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered the length of the array to be the dimensionality. Is that insufficient? (or non-obvious enough that I should mention it explicitly)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be fine, xdg-shell already does the same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about add
urgent
state as it was mentioned in issue. For purpose not search urgent toplevels and not bound pureworkspace
module withtaskbar
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So,
active
state means "available" and "visible" workspace, doesn't it?In this case I think we need something like
current
state and only for one workspace in group.