Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

properly include txt files (#101) #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2017
Merged

properly include txt files (#101) #102

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2017

Conversation

thijstriemstra
Copy link
Collaborator

fixes #101

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 71.156% when pulling 1971a55 on readme-101 into e89c0e9 on master.

@sybrenstuvel sybrenstuvel merged commit a1f95da into master Dec 12, 2017
@sybrenstuvel
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

@sybrenstuvel sybrenstuvel deleted the readme-101 branch December 12, 2017 10:29
@thijstriemstra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No worries. @sybrenstuvel can you also put out new release/changelog/tag?

@sybrenstuvel
Copy link
Owner

Sure! Is the changelog up to date (i.e. do I only need to put the date in there)?

@thijstriemstra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thijstriemstra commented Dec 16, 2017

@sybrenstuvel there have been a couple of changes since the last release when looking at the commit log, if you can add those for a 2.3.2 section in changelog I think we're good to go.

@thijstriemstra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ping @sybrenstuvel

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

README ... files in wrong location after installing
3 participants