-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DI] Fixed custom services definition BC break introduced in ec7e70fb… #20609
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions
18
src/Symfony/Component/DependencyInjection/Tests/Fixtures/CustomDefinition.php
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
<?php | ||
|
||
/* | ||
* This file is part of the Symfony package. | ||
* | ||
* (c) Fabien Potencier <fabien@symfony.com> | ||
* | ||
* For the full copyright and license information, please view the LICENSE | ||
* file that was distributed with this source code. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
namespace Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Tests\Fixtures; | ||
|
||
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Definition; | ||
|
||
class CustomDefinition extends Definition | ||
{ | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not a decorated service. It is about using definition inheritance (yes, the name
DefinitionDecorator
is quite bad, but the service decoration feature was implemented years later)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Constructing service "foo" from parent definition "bar" etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I didn't knew that and just assumed that by name. I'm thinking how we can actually handle that without breaking custom definition classes.
Edit:
Actually if it's just that,
instanceof
checking for decorator should solve the problem, since for custom definition classes we'll never seeDefinitionDecorator
in inheritance chain while for decorators it will always be there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you update the message as suggested?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't you think we should update this message to inform about service inheritance? For me "Constructing service "..." from a ... is not supported at build time." is too generic.
Maybe "Constructing service SERVICE_ID inherited from PARENT_ID is not supported at build time." will be a better fit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's why I added the "parent" word above, which is also the vocabulary used to declare such services