Fix typo on only and without methods documentation

[JeanDavidDaviet]

Q	A
Bug fix?	no
New feature?	no
Issues
License	MIT

There are two typos in the only and without examples.
The intermediate representation still have the style and the classes attributes respectively.

[kbond]

The reason these extra attributes were included was to explicitly show that they are excluded when rendering the component. Am I missing something - does it not work as expected?

[WebMamba]

Agree with @kbond here, I think the documentation show the right things here

[smnandre]

We may want to reverse the order to make it easier

1/ Calling template

2/ Component template

3/ HTML result

[kbond]

TBH, I don't have a good use-case for the only/without methods. If someone has a good use-case, let's update the docs to show.

[JeanDavidDaviet]

thx @kbond for your input I understand more the reason.
I think @smnandre's idea is better as you can better see the initial values and compare it with the final result.
I've updated the PR.
I personnaly think it makes more sense this way, what do you think ?

[kbond]

Thank you Jean-David.