-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
--salti is very time consuming #4
Comments
Hi,
You can try increasing winstep size, this should help quite a bit. I saw in
your other email you had window of 51 and step of 6; perhaps try increasing
step to 25 or 50.
Zachary
Le jeu. 30 nov. 2023 à 3:55 PM, yangwukaidi ***@***.***> a
écrit :
… Dear Michael DeGiorgio, Ph.D.
Thank you very much for your reply.
As you said, the New software saltiLASSI works really well.
I found --salti to be very time-consuming.
I want to know a .vcf dataset of 650,000 loci from 30 individuals, and how
long does it take to use --salti?
The commands I use are as follows:
*lassip --spectra Z.chr12.lassip.hap.spectra.gz --salti --out Z.chr12*
Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishs for you.
Yang
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAKRQTMCGREJ5K7ODV7F43YHCM5PAVCNFSM6AAAAABABKLN46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGAYTQOBUGYZDONA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hello,
This is strange that you would get all 0. Can you tell me which version of
the software you are using?
Zachary
Le ven. 1 déc. 2023 à 9:16 AM, yangwukaidi ***@***.***> a
écrit :
… Hi, Dear Zachary A. Szpiech Ph.D
Thank you very much for your reply.
As you said, increasing winstep size did reduce the time consuming, the
software is running normally.
When I look at the result file for --salti(win51 step51), the m value is
always 0, as follows,
1701418495825.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/assets/127917612/8b1bd02d-a04b-4f6a-a6b7-3bcfbdeac9a7>
However, this is not the case in the result file of -lassi(win51 step6),
as follows,
1701418495820.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/assets/127917612/5c701c93-50e6-4c31-8ecb-92f9c5246d4b>
Is it normal that m is always equal to 0? What's the point of m being
equal to 0? Or how can I try to improve it?
Isn't this dataset only suitable for use -- lassi?
Looking forward to your reply.
Best.
Yang
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAKRQQ5Z7BKHOLPFEH2TO3YHGG4HAVCNFSM6AAAAABABKLN46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMZVGY3DCMBZHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi. |
phase1Z12.vcf.gz |
Hello,
I am currently travelling for work and won't be able to look carefully at
this until at least a week from now. I'm wondering if the bug fix I
introduced in 1.1.2 actually created another one. I restored the v1.1.1
linux binary on the salti branch, which you can find here
https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/tree/salti/bin/linux . You can try this
one and let me know if the issue still exists in the meantime.
Zachary
…On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 6:18 AM yangwukaidi ***@***.***> wrote:
phase1Z12.vcf.gz
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/files/13525560/phase1Z12.vcf.gz>
Z.chr12.lassip.hap.spectra.gz
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/files/13525582/Z.chr12.lassip.hap.spectra.gz>
Z.chr12.lassip.hap.stats.gz
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/files/13525584/Z.chr12.lassip.hap.stats.gz>
Z.ids.pop.txt
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/files/13525611/Z.ids.pop.txt>
Z.salti.chr12.lassip.hap.out.gz
<https://github.com/szpiech/lassip/files/13525759/Z.salti.chr12.lassip.hap.out.gz>
All the relevant documents are attached, please check.
Yang.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAKRQXL5CDA5F566MWQJXLYHG4I3AVCNFSM6AAAAABABKLN46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMZVHEYTKOBRGA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi, Dear Zachary A. Szpiech Ph.D |
Dear @szpiech, Could it be related with win size? |
Hello,
780 does seem quite large, but I’m concerned you have a version of the
program with the same bug as the first user. Would you try grabbing the
mossy recent version and trying that?
Zachary
Le jeu. 4 juil. 2024 à 04:19, cgdmkns ***@***.***> a écrit :
… Dear @szpiech <https://github.com/szpiech>,
Since I'm facing the same issue as @yangwukaidi
<https://github.com/yangwukaidi>, I'm adding my comment here. I have a
salti result for 780snp window with 100 step size, all m values are 0. I'm
using v1.1.1.
The commands I used:(used parallel to estimate for each chromosome)
lassip --vcf chr1.vcf --hapstats --salti --calc-spec --winsize 780
--winstep 100 --out Chr1_bal --pop my_popID.txt
lassip --spectra Chr1_bal.lassip.hap.spectra.gz --salti --out chr1
Here is a part of the result.
saltilassi_result.xlsx
<https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16095490/saltilassi_result.xlsx>
Could it be related with win size?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAKRQRKL4VCMPRGIJSNFC3ZKUARZAVCNFSM6AAAAABKLBEYJGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMBYGM4DKNRZGA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sure, I'll do. 780 window size is based on the interval over which LD decayed below one-third of its original value relative to pairs of loci separated by 1 kb as stated in Harris and DeGiorgio,2020. I estimated the SNP density at that interval. But I'll give it a try for smaller windows as well. Thanks! |
Dear @szpiech, It worked with the v1.2.0.Now I have m values different than 0. Cigdem |
Great, glad to hear it!
Le mer. 10 juil. 2024 à 04:15, cgdmkns ***@***.***> a écrit :
… Dear @szpiech <https://github.com/szpiech>,
It worked with the v1.2.0.Now I have m values different than 0.
I appreciate your help!
Cigdem
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAKRQXPAAHHMAD2P4S3X53ZLTUQ5AVCNFSM6AAAAABKLBEYJGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMJZHA2DMNRRGA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Dear Michael DeGiorgio, Ph.D.
Thank you very much for your reply.
As you said, the New software saltiLASSI works really well.
I found --salti to be very time-consuming.
I want to know a .vcf dataset of 650,000 loci from 30 individuals, and how long does it take to use --salti?
The commands I use are as follows:
lassip --spectra Z.chr12.lassip.hap.spectra.gz --salti --out Z.chr12
Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishs for you.
Yang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: