You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The preposition property defaults in the vehicle class itself defaults to "in" and "out", but in the case of a horse should be changed to the more suitable "on" and "off".
is hard to read due to the double occurring "defaults", which introduces ambiguity as to which one is a verb — it comes natural to interpret the first occurrence as the verb, which then breaks the sentence at the second occurrence, forcing to read the whole sentence again.
Something like this might be smoother on the reader (and shorter too):
In the vehicle class the preposition property defaults to "in" and "out", but in the case of a horse it should be changed to the more suitable "on" and "off".
Of course, the sentence is grammatically correct, but I've found it quite hard to read through in one go, and it struck me as one of the very few places in the whole book where the reading flow was abruptly interrupted. We might as well take this reprint as a change to polish it.
References
Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson — a textbook on how to maximize ambiguities in spoken and written sentences. Offers a classification system for ambiguities, and discusses their psychological impact on the listener and reader.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In "§10.6. Vehicles", the hard to read sentence:
> The `preposition` property DEFAULTS in the `vehicle` class itself
> DEFAULTS to..."
was fixed (with @tessman approval) to the easier (and shorter):
> In the `vehicle` class the `preposition` property DEFAULTS to...
* Documented changes in `CHANGES.md`.
* Rebuild book.
(Closes#30)
@tessman:
In §10.6. Vehicles the sentence:
is hard to read due to the double occurring "defaults", which introduces ambiguity as to which one is a verb — it comes natural to interpret the first occurrence as the verb, which then breaks the sentence at the second occurrence, forcing to read the whole sentence again.
Something like this might be smoother on the reader (and shorter too):
Of course, the sentence is grammatically correct, but I've found it quite hard to read through in one go, and it struck me as one of the very few places in the whole book where the reading flow was abruptly interrupted. We might as well take this reprint as a change to polish it.
References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: