-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explore backups for fixed LVM, non-CoW storage #31
Comments
After researching hybrid snapshots, there is no way to target a non-thin vol + thin snapshot consistently since the non-thin volume's state cannot be known from its metadata. The combination could easily be corrupted and Wyng would have no way to detect or compensate for it. So I'm changing this issue to a general 'Support volumes in non-snapshot storage' theme. Such volumes would have to be added to the archive with a special option flagging them as non-CoW, and they would essentially trigger a --remap on each incremental Users should be consistently reminded of this special mode to prevent confusion about slower backup times, etc. |
Some support for this can be added via an option like |
…#31 Move getperms() to allow stating any path
@tlaurion Implemented option
The char sequence ':|:' is used as a delimiter between the archive volume name and the source file path. This requires testing. |
receive: Fix exception with zero-sized volumes
@tasket i tried to test this today through |
Many systems are installed with fixed (non-thin) lvm volumes and documentation suggests thin snapshots can be created for fixed volumes. If so, it may be possible to use the thin lvm tools to track deltas for fixed volumes the same way as in an all-thin environment.
The challenges for implementation are:
Barring the above, it may be helpful to reference documentation showing the best practices for converting fixed-lvm systems over to thin pools, btrfs, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: