Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DwC Mapping - MIXS:0000002 samp_collect_device #20

Closed
tucotuco opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

DwC Mapping - MIXS:0000002 samp_collect_device #20

tucotuco opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
DwC Mapping The issue is about the mapping of a MIxS term to a Darwin Core term or terms. DwC-MIxS TG This issue is related to the work of the Sustainable DarwinCore MIxS Interoperability Task Group

Comments

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

tucotuco commented Feb 10, 2021

Field Value
subject_id http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/samplingProtocol
subject_definition The name of, reference to, or description of the method or protocol used during an Event.
subject_usage_notes
subject_examples UV light trap, mist net, bottom trawl, ad hoc observation, point count, Penguins from space: faecal stains reveal the location of emperor penguin colonies, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00467.x, Takats et al. 2001. Guidelines for Nocturnal Owl Monitoring in North America. Beaverhill Bird Observatory and Bird Studies Canada, Edmonton, Alberta. 32 pp., http://www.bsc-eoc.org/download/Owl.pdf
predicate_id skos:broadMatch
object_id MIXS:0000002
object_label samp_collect_device
object definition The method or device employed for collecting the sample
object source https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs-legacy/blob/master/mixs5/mixs_v5.xlsx
comment dwc:samplingProtocol covers both of the concepts samp_collect_device and samp_collect_process.
@tucotuco tucotuco added the DwC Mapping The issue is about the mapping of a MIxS term to a Darwin Core term or terms. label Feb 10, 2021
@pbuttigieg pbuttigieg added the DwC-MIxS TG This issue is related to the work of the Sustainable DarwinCore MIxS Interoperability Task Group label Mar 2, 2021
@raissameyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Suggested syntax predicate for the mapping above #20 (comment)

Field Value
subject_id http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/samplingProtocol
subject_value_syntax - expected_value - unit
syntax_predicate_id skos:relatedMatch
object_id MIXS:0000002
object_value_syntax - expected_value - unit {text} - type name
syntax_comment DwC expects the name of, reference to, or description (which could also include a URI, IRI, etc.), while MIxS only expects a label

@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Collaborator

This is interesting.

both of these terms confound methods and devices (the DwC in its examples, MIxS in its definitions). We should recommend that both standards resolve these into separate terms.

In the meantime we may be looking at a semantic exact match (based on the examples).
If the definitions are the only thing we're going on, then a DwC (methods) broadMatch MIxS (methods or devices) would be fine.

@raissameyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Noted this also in the comment of our SSSOM mapping matrix

Both of these terms list both, the names of (or links to) methods, or devices (either in the definition or in the examples). Taking the definition and the examples into account these could be skos:exactMatch, focusing only on the definition, skos:broadMatch would be appropriate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DwC Mapping The issue is about the mapping of a MIxS term to a Darwin Core term or terms. DwC-MIxS TG This issue is related to the work of the Sustainable DarwinCore MIxS Interoperability Task Group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants