-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mapping template for MIDS level 1 #49
Comments
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Mapping of MIDS-1 elements
|
Some matching terms I found, organization has an exact match in ABCD (I think), we might fit MIDS level in openDS (which has a narrower def), dcterms modified/license are in DWC - maybe that fits also for MIDS?
|
I've been working on a JSON schema to automate calculations of MIDS levels. The schema maps MIDS elements to specific properties in a dataset. The scope was currently on (GBIF-annotated) DwC archives, but I hope to extend it to other standards as well. There was support for XML as well, to enable mappings to EML metadata (specifically dataset publication date for the Modified MIDS element), but that needs further fleshing out in the JSON and is only partially supported in the current (unfinished) version of the Rshiny app that makes use of the schema. |
Hi Mathias,
this is interesting but maybe not the right approach since DwC is not fully
compatible (yet) with MIDS. So you get mappings that are not
entirely correct, for instance specimen type is not basis of record (in
openDS we now have a proposed list of 10 types + 7 not currently in scope
of DiSSCo), name is not always scientific or vernacular name (e.g. can be a
chemical formula for a mineral), MIDS institution(P)ID does not equal
dwc:institutionID (which does not need to be resolvable). So I think either
you need to map to openDS and GBIF needs to support that (in the future) as
one of the supported schemas or DwC needs changes to support MIDS elements.
Kind regards,
Wouter
…On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 11:32, Mathias Dillen ***@***.***> wrote:
I've been working on a JSON schema to automate calculations of MIDS
levels. The schema maps MIDS elements to specific properties in a dataset.
The scope was currently on (GBIF-annotated) DwC archives, but I hope to
extend it to other standards as well.
There was support for XML as well, to enable mappings to EML metadata
(specifically dataset publication date for the Modified MIDS element), but
that needs further fleshing out in the JSON and is only partially supported
in the current (unfinished) version of the Rshiny app that makes use of the
schema.
https://github.com/AgentschapPlantentuinMeise/MIDSCalculator/blob/main/data/schemas/fourthschema.json
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#49 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADAUXUQZLZFBZDX4445RA3VTU3UPANCNFSM5BEEIYWQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
Coördinator Research-data and E-infrastructure
International Biodiversity Infrastructures
Natural Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Coordination team member, Distributed System of Scientific Collections (
DiSSCo <http://dissco.eu/>)
Node Manager for DiSSCo, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF
<http://www.gbif.org/>)
Regional representative for Europe, Biodiversity Information Standards
Organisation (TDWG <http://tdwg.org/>)
Chair Biodiversity Data Integration IG, Research Data Alliance (RDA
<http://www.rd-alliance.org/>)
Catalogue of Life Ambassador (CoL <http://www.catalogueoflife.org/>)
*ORCID*: 0000-0002-3090-1761 | *Linkedin*: *linkedin.com/in/wouteraddink/
<http://linkedin.com/in/wouteraddink/>*
*Twitter*: @wouter99999 | *Tel*: +31 (0) 71 751 9364
***@***.*** - www.naturalis.nl - www.catalogueoflife.org -
www.dissco.eu
|
Both openDS and ongoing developments in TDWG task groups for Darwin Core are currently still moving targets with no effective implementations yet and hence no GBIF support. We used Darwin Core as it is used as of now, because it is already widely implemented and available, hence it can be utilized for immediate MIDS calculations. The mappings are not perfect, as Darwin Core is not either and MIDS itself is still being developed, but dwc:basisOfRecord is the best approximation we have now for specimenType. Mineral names are currently not in scope of this schema. We would probably need a different one to accommodate such specimens. Mappings to ABCD may be useful in this regard, but we'd have to develop them and I lack experience with that standard to make that happen efficiently. |
This has been superceded by other mapping issue versions |
Design and agree mapping template for mapping institutional collection management and other data management schema terms/fields to MIDS level 1 information elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: