forked from bluez/bluetooth-next
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PW_SID:375505] Fix for Bluetooth SIG test L2CAP/COS/CFD/BV-14-C. #43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This patch adds workflow files for ci: [schedule_work.yml] - The workflow file for scheduled work - Sync the repo with upstream repo and rebase the workflow branch - Review the patches in the patchwork and creates the PR if needed [ci.yml] - The workflow file for CI tasks - Run CI tests when PR is created
This test case is meant to verify that multiple unknown options is included in the response. Unknown options shall be in the response if they are not hints according to Bluetooth Core Spec v5.2. See chapter 4.5 L2CAP_CONFIGURATION_RSP Signed-off-by: Jimmy Wahlberg <jimmywa@spotify.com>
checkpatch: PASS |
checkgitlint: FAIL Output:
|
checkbuild: SKIP Output:
|
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2022
Some function calls are not implemented in rxrpc_no_security, there are preparse_server_key, free_preparse_server_key and destroy_server_key. When rxrpc security type is rxrpc_no_security, user can easily trigger a null-ptr-deref bug via ioctl. So judgment should be added to prevent it The crash log: user@syzkaller:~$ ./rxrpc_preparse_s [ 37.956878][T15626] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [ 37.957645][T15626] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode [ 37.958229][T15626] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page [ 37.958762][T15626] PGD 4aadf067 P4D 4aadf067 PUD 4aade067 PMD 0 [ 37.959321][T15626] Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 37.959739][T15626] CPU: 0 PID: 15626 Comm: rxrpc_preparse_ Not tainted 5.17.0-01442-gb47d5a4f6b8d #43 [ 37.960588][T15626] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 [ 37.961474][T15626] RIP: 0010:0x0 [ 37.961787][T15626] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. [ 37.962480][T15626] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d9abdc0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 37.963018][T15626] RAX: ffffffff84335200 RBX: ffff888012a1ce80 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 37.963727][T15626] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff84a736dc RDI: ffffc9000d9abe48 [ 37.964425][T15626] RBP: ffffc9000d9abe48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002 [ 37.965118][T15626] R10: 000000000000000a R11: f000000000000000 R12: ffff888013145680 [ 37.965836][T15626] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffffffffffec R15: ffff8880432aba80 [ 37.966441][T15626] FS: 00007f2177907700(0000) GS:ffff88803ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 37.966979][T15626] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 37.967384][T15626] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000004aaf1000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 37.967864][T15626] Call Trace: [ 37.968062][T15626] <TASK> [ 37.968240][T15626] rxrpc_preparse_s+0x59/0x90 [ 37.968541][T15626] key_create_or_update+0x174/0x510 [ 37.968863][T15626] __x64_sys_add_key+0x139/0x1d0 [ 37.969165][T15626] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 [ 37.969451][T15626] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 37.969824][T15626] RIP: 0033:0x43a1f9 Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Huang <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com> Tested-by: Xiaolong Huang <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2022-March/005069.html Fixes: 12da59f ("rxrpc: Hand server key parsing off to the security class") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164865013439.2941502.8966285221215590921.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2024
.probe() (ahci_init_one()) calls sysfs_add_file_to_group(), however, if probe() fails after this call, we currently never call sysfs_remove_file_from_group(). (The sysfs_remove_file_from_group() call in .remove() (ahci_remove_one()) does not help, as .remove() is not called on .probe() error.) Thus, if probe() fails after the sysfs_add_file_to_group() call, the next time we insmod the module we will get: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/remapped_nvme' CPU: 11 PID: 954 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #43 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x17/0x23 sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0x11a/0x130 sysfs_add_file_to_group+0x7e/0xc0 ahci_init_one+0x31f/0xd40 [ahci] Fixes: 894fba7 ("ata: ahci: Add sysfs attribute to show remapped NVMe device count") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240629124210.181537-10-cassel@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2024
This fixes a NULL pointer dereference bug due to a data race which looks like this: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 33 PID: 16573 Comm: kworker/u97:799 Not tainted 6.8.7-cm4all1-hp+ #43 Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9/ProLiant DL380 Gen9, BIOS P89 10/17/2018 Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work RIP: 0010:cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0 Code: 57 41 56 45 89 ce 41 55 49 89 cd 41 54 49 89 d4 55 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 48 8b 47 08 48 83 7f 10 00 48 89 34 24 48 8b 68 20 <48> 8b 45 08 4c 8b 38 74 45 49 8b 7f 50 e8 4e a9 b0 ff 48 8b 73 10 RSP: 0018:ffffb4e78113bde0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: ffff976126be6d10 RBX: ffff97615cdb8438 RCX: 0000000000020000 RDX: ffff97605e6c4c68 RSI: ffff97605e6c4c60 RDI: ffff97615cdb8438 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000278333 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff97605e6c4600 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97605e6c4c68 R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff976064fe2c00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9776dfd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000005942c002 CR4: 00000000001706f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x1f/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x15d/0x440 ? search_module_extables+0xe/0x40 ? fixup_exception+0x22/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x5f/0x100 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? cachefiles_prepare_write+0x30/0xa0 netfs_rreq_write_to_cache_work+0x135/0x2e0 process_one_work+0x137/0x2c0 worker_thread+0x2e9/0x400 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcc/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000008 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This happened because fscache_cookie_state_machine() was slow and was still running while another process invoked fscache_unuse_cookie(); this led to a fscache_cookie_lru_do_one() call, setting the FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD flag, which was picked up by fscache_cookie_state_machine(), withdrawing the cookie via cachefiles_withdraw_cookie(), clearing cookie->cache_priv. At the same time, yet another process invoked cachefiles_prepare_write(), which found a NULL pointer in this code line: struct cachefiles_object *object = cachefiles_cres_object(cres); The next line crashes, obviously: struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object->volume->cache; During cachefiles_prepare_write(), the "n_accesses" counter is non-zero (via fscache_begin_operation()). The cookie must not be withdrawn until it drops to zero. The counter is checked by fscache_cookie_state_machine() before switching to FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_RELINQUISHING and FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_WITHDRAWING (in "case FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_FAILED"), but not for FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_LRU_DISCARDING ("case FSCACHE_COOKIE_STATE_ACTIVE"). This patch adds the missing check. With a non-zero access counter, the function returns and the next fscache_end_cookie_access() call will queue another fscache_cookie_state_machine() call to handle the still-pending FSCACHE_COOKIE_DO_LRU_DISCARD. Fixes: 12bb21a ("fscache: Implement cookie user counting and resource pinning") Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240729162002.3436763-2-dhowells@redhat.com cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This test case is meant to verify that multiple
unknown options is included in the response.
Unknown options shall be in the response if
they are not hints according to Bluetooth Core
Spec v5.2. See chapter 4.5 L2CAP_CONFIGURATION_RSP
Signed-off-by: Jimmy Wahlberg jimmywa@spotify.com