-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support pydantic v2 #23
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #23 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.57% 97.26% +1.68%
==========================================
Files 6 7 +1
Lines 113 146 +33
Branches 11 15 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 108 142 +34
+ Misses 5 3 -2
- Partials 0 1 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@tefra any plans on continuing this effort? Could you give me a rough idea of status and missing pieces then I can have a look and eventually have a shot at this. |
I am so unbelievably stretched, honestly @fleimgruber I don't know, for the next couple of months I don't see how. Even then pydantic moves so fast this project is really doomed, I should admit defeat and simply shut it down. |
Thanks for checking back and your honesty. Maybe pydantic stabilizes at some point and then this can be picked up again - I think this project is a good idea! |
Pydantic has locked us out, there is no way to add additional metadata per field, the extras are deprecated and the json_schema_extra expects json values... Creating true pydantic models, is impossible.... back to the drawing board |
455ca04
to
1778ea1
Compare
e517d4d
to
3bce9f6
Compare
📒 Description
The goal is to add support for pydantic v2 models.
🔗 What I've Done
💬 Comments
🛫 Checklist