Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pipeline run support for cloud events #2938

Conversation

afrittoli
Copy link
Member

@afrittoli afrittoli commented Jul 14, 2020

Changes

Replace the pipeline run controller own config store with the
shared one used by the taskrun controller too. The pipeline run
config store is only useful to the artifact storage, however
the artifact storage loads the config by fetching the configmap
via the kube client, so it does not use the config store.

Attaching the shared config store to the controller, along with
the cloud events client, enables the pipeline run controller to
start sending cloud events for all events where we send k8s events
today (except for error ones).

Add a reconciler unit test to verify that events are sent when
the sink is configured.

Fixes #2082

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Add cloud events for pipeline runs via the  configuration option `default-cloud-events-sink`.
When the default sink is setup, cloud events are sent, else they're disabled.

Send cloud events (when enabled) from the pipeline run and controller, for all non-error
events that are already notified via k8s events.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Jul 14, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from imjasonh and a user July 14, 2020 16:33
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 14, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
internal/builder/v1beta1/pipeline.go 82.1% 81.2% -1.0
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 85.9% 86.0% 0.0

@afrittoli afrittoli force-pushed the issues/2082-add-cloud-events-pipelinerun branch from e51caf3 to f1fa437 Compare July 14, 2020 16:37
@afrittoli
Copy link
Member Author

/kind feature

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jul 14, 2020
@afrittoli afrittoli added this to the Pipelines v0.15 milestone Jul 14, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
internal/builder/v1beta1/pipeline.go 82.1% 81.2% -1.0
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 85.9% 86.0% 0.0

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM, just one question

pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/controller.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@afrittoli afrittoli force-pushed the issues/2082-add-cloud-events-pipelinerun branch from f1fa437 to b820c9d Compare July 15, 2020 10:46
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
internal/builder/v1beta1/pipeline.go 82.1% 81.2% -1.0
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 85.9% 86.0% 0.0

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2020
@afrittoli afrittoli force-pushed the issues/2082-add-cloud-events-pipelinerun branch from b820c9d to d7716b3 Compare July 17, 2020 15:21
@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 17, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
internal/builder/v1beta1/pipeline.go 82.1% 81.2% -1.0

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 17, 2020
@afrittoli afrittoli force-pushed the issues/2082-add-cloud-events-pipelinerun branch from d7716b3 to 14bc469 Compare July 17, 2020 15:33
@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 17, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
internal/builder/v1beta1/pipeline.go 82.1% 81.2% -1.0
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 85.9% 86.0% 0.0

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/meow

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: cat image

In response to this:

/lgtm
/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 17, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 25, 2020
Replace the pipeline run controller own config store with the
shared one used by the taskrun controller too. The pipeline run
config store is only useful to the artifact storage, however
the artifact storage loads the config by fetching the configmap
via the kube client, so it does not use the config store.

Attaching the shared config store to the controller, along with
the cloud events client, enables the pipeline run controller to
start sending cloud events for all events where we send k8s events
today (except for error ones).

Add a reconciler unit test to verify that events are sent when
the sink is configured.

Drop reconciler/pipelinerun/config because it's not used. It was
injected in the pipeline run controller before, but not used.
We can add the store for artifact configs back in a different
commit, but it wil have to be part of the shared store.
@afrittoli afrittoli force-pushed the issues/2082-add-cloud-events-pipelinerun branch from 14bc469 to 7f2b781 Compare July 25, 2020 23:16
@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 25, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
internal/builder/v1beta1/pipeline.go 82.1% 81.2% -1.0
pkg/reconciler/pipelinerun/pipelinerun.go 86.0% 86.0% 0.0

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 26, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 27, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 27, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit e6c91d2 into tektoncd:master Jul 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Optionally emit events during execution
3 participants