Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pull request template spring cleaning 馃尫 #3866

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2021

Conversation

bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

I removed the blocks on reviewer notes and on updating the release
pipeline for new images because I don't get the impression these were
serving any useful purponse; and I think having noise in the pull
request template might distract people from the important bits, like the
checklist which is still often ignored :(

I also tried to update the checklist to refer our new(ish) guidelines
since I don't think the existing links actually worked anymore 馃槵

/kind cleanup

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • [n/a] Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

NONE

I removed the blocks on reviewer notes and on updating the release
pipeline for new images because I don't get the impression these were
serving any useful purponse; and I think having noise in the pull
request template might distract people from the important bits, like the
checklist which is still often ignored :(

I also tried to update the checklist to refer our new(ish) guidelines
since I don't think the existing links actually worked anymore 馃槵
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Apr 1, 2021
@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tektoncd/core-maintainers

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 1, 2021
@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator Author

p.s. shout out to @shuheiktgw for fixing these links in triggers!! (tektoncd/triggers#844) thank you! 馃檹

Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

馃挴

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 1, 2021
@jerop
Copy link
Member

jerop commented Apr 5, 2021

/lgtm
/meow

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jerop: cat image

In response to this:

/lgtm
/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 5, 2021
@jerop
Copy link
Member

jerop commented Apr 5, 2021

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

1 similar comment
@jerop
Copy link
Member

jerop commented Apr 5, 2021

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

Uhm... the webhook is returning 500, not sure why... investigating

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

1 similar comment
@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit b459114 into tektoncd:main Apr 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants