Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the new Interceptors Page #1035

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2021
Merged

Add the new Interceptors Page #1035

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2021

Conversation

tualeron
Copy link
Contributor

@tualeron tualeron commented Apr 5, 2021

Changes

Adds the new Interceptors page which breaks out existing legacy Interceptors docs from the EventListeners page, merges in docs for ClusterInterceptors, and rewrites the content for clarity and flow. When the rewritten EventListener page is published, we will update links that point to existing Interceptor and ClusterInterceptor docs to point to this new page.

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

See the contribution guide for more details.

Release Notes

NONE

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. label Apr 5, 2021
@tualeron
Copy link
Contributor Author

tualeron commented Apr 5, 2021

/kind documentation

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Apr 5, 2021
@tualeron
Copy link
Contributor Author

tualeron commented Apr 5, 2021

/assign @dibyom

Copy link
Member

@dibyom dibyom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also rename the file?

docs/interceptors.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/interceptors.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/interceptors.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Adds the new `Interceptors` page which breaks out existing legacy `Interceptors` docs from the `EventListeners` page, merges in docs for `ClusterInterceptors`, and rewrites the content for clarity and flow. When the rewritten `EventListener` page is published, we will update links that point to existing `Interceptor` and `ClusterInterceptor` docs to point to this new page.
@tualeron
Copy link
Contributor Author

Addressed all review comments - PTAL!

@jmcshane
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 14, 2021
@dibyom
Copy link
Member

dibyom commented Apr 14, 2021

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 14, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit f559b01 into tektoncd:main Apr 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants