Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace cmpopts.IgnoreTypes with IgnoreFields #1246

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

dibyom
Copy link
Member

@dibyom dibyom commented Oct 21, 2021

Changes

IgnoreTypes will ignore all values of the given type i.e. for apis.Condition{}.LastTransitionTime.Inner.Time,
it will ignore all instances of time.Time. Using cmpopts.IgnoreFields will only ignore the specific field.
This was the root cause behind #1245 since we were ignoring all []string values
while trying to ignore only objectMeta.Finalizer (which is of type []string)

Signed-off-by: Dibyo Mukherjee dibyo@google.com

Fixes #1245

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • [N/A] Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • [N/A] Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • [N/A] Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

See the contribution guide for more details.

Release Notes

IgnoreTypes will ignore all values of the given type i.e. for apis.Condition{}.LastTransitionTime.Inner.Time,
it will ignore all instances of time.Time. Using `cmpopts.IgnoreFields` will only ignore the specific field.
This was the root cause behind tektoncd#1245 since we were ignoring all []string values
while trying to ignore only objectMeta.Finalizer (which is of type []string)

Fixes tektoncd#1245

Signed-off-by: Dibyo Mukherjee <dibyo@google.com>
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Oct 21, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 21, 2021
@dibyom dibyom assigned dibyom, wlynch and savitaashture and unassigned dibyom Oct 21, 2021
Copy link
Member

@wlynch wlynch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2021
@tekton-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wlynch

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 21, 2021
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit eebe7e3 into tektoncd:main Oct 21, 2021
@dibyom dibyom deleted the 1245 branch December 23, 2021 19:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Find root cause for why reconciler tests were not failing
4 participants