Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tap to the latest version 🚀 #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2017
Merged

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Mar 29, 2017

Version 10.3.1 of tap just got published.

Dependency tap
Current Version 10.3.0
Type devDependency

The version 10.3.1 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of tap.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits .

  • 98106c5 v10.3.1
  • 309d9aa clearer and less subtly-ableist language in README

See the full diff.

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 5752338 on greenkeeper/tap-10.3.1 into 0b016d4 on master.

@cybermelmac cybermelmac merged commit 2b2f09a into master Apr 8, 2017
@cybermelmac cybermelmac deleted the greenkeeper/tap-10.3.1 branch April 8, 2017 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants