repairing the total balance calculation

[Viterbo]

Fixes #94

Description

The calculation was fixed as described in issue #94. The display part was not implemented due to a previous discussion where we agreed to skip that part because it will be refactored anyway in the near future.

Test scenarios

Let's call myaccount any account you control with the following balances:

• has some TLOS staking for NET and CPU
• some refunding TLOS (when you unstake)
• some TLOS staked in REX with unclaimed profits
• some liquid deposits (funds) in REX,
• some liquid in EVM,
• and finally some liquid TLOS.

test scenarios 1

• Log in using myaccount in web-wallet
• explore the same account using OBE.
• The total balance should only differ in Liquid EVM amount

test scenarios 2

• Log in using myaccount in web-wallet
• Move any TLOS from any of the balances without losing ownership (do not transfer)
• Refresh the website
• The total balance should be the same as before the balance movement.

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have cleaned up the code in the areas my change touches
• My changes generate no new warnings
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
• I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings
• I have removed any unnecessary console messages

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for wallet-staging ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	723fc65
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/wallet-staging/deploys/63c8bac20a91e3000968ae20
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-110--wallet-staging.netlify.app/
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for wallet-testnet ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	723fc65
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/wallet-testnet/deploys/63c8bac20572c60008442d62
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-110--wallet-testnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[Kersten-CR]

The balances seem to show correctly now. I have verified with EOS-Authority which is a match, and OBE (2 TLOS difference on my tested account though which equals staked resources), needs to be address separately for OBE @karynemayer @donnyquixotic

For the REX balance there is an issue with an edge case, where an account holds REX and REX Savings as the full amount of both is shown (no differentiation inside the balance), which can not be withdrawn with the web wallet and thus leads to an error when trying to remove all. This should be fixed with full code refactoring for Telos Station. @Viterbo

There is still an issue with "strange tokens" showing up though, both on Safari and Chrome, which should be fixed in the next sprint.

[Kersten-CR]

works as expected for Balance part and change of balances.

[Viterbo]

The balances seem to show correctly now. I have verified with EOS-Authority which is a match, and OBE (2 TLOS difference on my tested account though which equals staked resources), needs to be address separately for OBE @karynemayer @donnyquixotic

For the REX balance there is an issue with an edge case, where an account holds REX and REX Savings as the full amount of both is shown (no differentiation inside the balance), which can not be withdrawn with the web wallet and thus leads to an error when trying to remove all. This should be fixed with full code refactoring for Telos Station. @Viterbo

There is still an issue with "strange tokens" showing up though, both on Safari and Chrome, which should be fixed in the next sprint.

@Kersten-CR,
What you say about REX and saving is correct. The total amount of REX displayed includes everything:

• Matured (ready to withdraw)
• Deposits (ready to withdraw)
• Profits (partially, depends)
• Maturing (not ready)
• Savings (not ready)

In the near future spring, we can address the refactoring task which will be a definitive and clean solution.

Also, I created this issue (#126) to address the custom token list problems.