Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 17, 2021. It is now read-only.

Fix issue re Pooling1D layer deserialization #208

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 23, 2018

Conversation

caisq
Copy link
Contributor

@caisq caisq commented May 23, 2018

The handling of number versus [number] types for the Pooling1D layer
and its subtypes, e.g., MaxPooling1D, was not done correctly, leading to
errors during deserialization of such layers. This PR fixes that.

Fixes: tensorflow/tfjs#331

BUG: Fix the loading of Pooling1D layers such as MaxPooling1D.


This change is Reviewable

The handling of `number` versus `[number]` types for the Pooling1D layer
and its subtypes, e.g., MaxPooling1D, was not done correctly, leading to
errors during deserialization of such layers. This PR fixes that.

Fixes: tensorflow/tfjs#331
@bileschi
Copy link
Contributor

:lgtm_strong:


Review status: 0 of 3 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@caisq caisq merged commit 5375a1a into tensorflow:master May 23, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loading model consisting of conv1d, maxPooling1d and dense layers fails
2 participants