Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NuclearDataIO and CCCC clean-ups #290

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 11, 2021

Conversation

jakehader
Copy link
Member

Providing some clean-ups to the nuclearDataIO package (removing unused code) and incorporating some more
documentation. The goal is to make a step in the direction of decoupling the nuclearDataIO package from the
ARMI framework #259 and to do some general restructuring to start standardizing the documentation and testing
across #287.

provide any meaningful examples of its intended use or support.
Grabbing MT and MF descriptions is quite easy to do from online
and having these descriptions available in the framework does not
add a lot of utility.
and only implements a dictionary compare method. The framework
specifically provides no intended use cases or testing.
more general implementation of NHFLUX within the cccc files
with the variant keyword argument set to True.
or GAMISO file within the __init__ of nuclearDataIO. It is
preferred for client code to import direct paths to the
specific CCCC objects.
@jakehader jakehader requested a review from youngmit May 2, 2021 04:29
@jakehader jakehader changed the title NuclearDataIO and CCCC clean-ups. NuclearDataIO and CCCC clean-ups May 2, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ntouran ntouran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I didn't realize the "old" NHFLUX was totally unused now. this is great.

@ntouran
Copy link
Member

ntouran commented May 11, 2021

Oops something wrong with the unit tests though!

Copy link
Member

@ntouran ntouran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh gotta fix unit tests though.

`test_xsNuclides` after the removal of the `ISOTXS` function
in the `nuclearDataIO` module. Now, the `isotxs.readBinary`
function is called directly.
@jakehader jakehader requested review from ntouran and removed request for youngmit May 11, 2021 03:47
@jakehader
Copy link
Member Author

@ntouran, fixed the unit tests and tested locally.

@jakehader jakehader merged commit 3d29974 into terrapower:master May 11, 2021
@jakehader jakehader deleted the cccc_cleanups branch May 11, 2021 04:37
@jakehader jakehader added cleanup Code/comment cleanup: Low Priority documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels May 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleanup Code/comment cleanup: Low Priority documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants