docs: Remove embedmd in examples and mixin
#4587
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Saswata Mukherjee <saswataminsta@yahoo.com>
IMHO yes, because there are some pages on the website that reference examples and Mixin docs so instead of hardcoding the GitHub links and redirecting them to Github we can have separate sections for them on the website itself. And I guess it would be a better experience to have everything in one place. Let's wait for some maintainers' review on this. thanks |
|
Do we want to add them in this PR or next? |
|
Will handle in next PR! 🙂 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
This PR removes
embedmdand shifts tomdoxfor markdown content present inexamplesandmixin. Also removesgenflagdocs.shas its functionality has been replaced in #4357.Open question: Should Examples and Mixin docs be added to the website sidebar, as currently they can only be referenced through GitHub? 🙂
Verification
Tested locally.