Laps-picking function improvements

[Casper-Guo]

Reference: #370

Additionally implemented any and none for the how argument of pick_track_status.

[theOehrly]

I'll try to review this soon. Ignore CI failures again, that problem should be fixed for new PRs though, I hope.

[theOehrly]

I forgot one thing, all the docstrings for deprecated functions should get a .. deprecated:: note as well, so that this is already obvious from the documentation. It should basically contain the same info as the warning.

[Casper-Guo]

I replaced all ff1.pick_* with session_laps.pick_*. I will squash the commits before merging.

[theOehrly]

The .pick_* functions currently don't have dedicated tests and I don't want to ask you to create them for all.
But especially considering the added complexity in .pick_track_status and the mix of number and abbreviation supported in pick_drivers, it would be good if these to get tests.
In general, the policy here is, that new features should get tests (whenever reasonably possible).

The doc build failure seems to occur because the .. deprecated:: directive is used incorrectly. See https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/restructuredtext/directives.html#directive-deprecated

[Casper-Guo]

I was actually going to ask if you would like me to add tests anyways. I will write some in the next few days.

[Casper-Guo]

Changed implementation of pick_compound to bring it in line with other picking functions. It also accepts a list of compound names now.

Modelled some tests after the existing test cases. Please let me know if you want them done another way.

[theOehrly]

Test failures are because of your changes (except documentation build).

[Casper-Guo]

Linting problem outside of this PR

[theOehrly]

Looks good now. Do you have any further changes or remarks, or are you happy with everything?

[Casper-Guo]

No more changes from me. Really appreciate your patience with this PR.

[theOehrly]

No more changes from me. Really appreciate your patience with this PR.

This took longer than I thought, yes. But that's just the way it ends up being sometimes. If you feel like I could have given better feedback on the way, please let me know. Like just about everything else on this project, reviewing PRs is something I learn as I go. Therefore, feel free to criticize and I'll try to improve in the future.