Fee_v.06: http://goo.gl/upBcCx

[paullojorgge]

Need a test sample to test the new "applied" attribute for the fee:fee elements

[thedarkwinter]

Hi Paulo

Any tests written? E.G. To determine if the correct version is loaded on greeting? Any other changes added in this branch? Doesn't seem to be much except for omitting the fee element. According to the draft there are a few other changes such as the applied element.

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-brown-epp-fees-03.html#rfc.section.8.3

8.3. Changes from 02 to 03

1. Added the "applied" attribute to to fee:fee elements.
2. Simplified the wording in relation to when a server can return an error for extended commands.
3. Added the fee:period element to transfer query responses.
4. Removed wording about how servers behave when receiving incorrect fee information from transform commands, and put it into a single section at the top of the document.
5. Allow servers to omit fee:fee elements from fee:cd elements if the command specified by the client is forbidden.

Cheers,
Michael

[paullojorgge]

Hi Michael!

Added a test file for crr since it looks like that only Charleston Road Registry is using the fee v0.6 at the moment.

Cheers,
Paulo

[thedarkwinter]

Thanks Paulo, I have squashed this in here: 03b068e