Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add satellite_config_dump role #548

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

Add satellite_config_dump role #548

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

jwbernin
Copy link
Contributor

The satellite_config_dump role is intended to be used with a
future satellite_config_load role as a way to easily
replicate the configuration of a Satellite to a new Satellite.

Completing the role will require the merging of #537 - the current PR is being
created to garner early feedback on the role in question.

The satellite_config_dump role is intended to be used with a
future satellite_config_load role as a way to easily
replicate the configuration of a Satellite to a new Satellite.
@evgeni evgeni added this to the roles milestone Nov 22, 2019
@evgeni
Copy link
Member

evgeni commented Nov 22, 2019

cc @sthirugn

wbclark and others added 22 commits December 9, 2019 15:40
* add basic tests for diff

* make diff test ansible 2.7 compatible
* Correct documentation for the operatingsystem module

* Add all the OS families

* Correct linting

* Complete the documentation for OS families

* Deduplicate OS choice list

* Remove VRP from installation media module docs
some calls are read only, but we don't use the find/list wrappers
because the api is weird. let's allow these.

otherwise e.g. katello_activation_key is broken in check mode when
trying to assign content overrides
that ensures we use the right entity_spec for different entities
this was removed in
ansible/ansible@e9f8a34
in favor of a real check whether the module is properly initialized --
and ours are :)
@evgeni evgeni closed this Jul 24, 2020
@evgeni evgeni mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2020
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants