Rspec 1.3.x support

[robertodecurnex]

Rspec 1.3.x support

[jeffkreeftmeijer]

I thought it would be nice to support both RSpec 1.x and 2.x in the same gem / branch, but that didn't really work. Your patch is probably one of the nicer ways to handle this, but still makes the whole thing a bit clunky. And, as you said, it's pretty much untestable in one run.

I decided to support RSpec 1.x in a separate branch: https://github.com/jeffkreeftmeijer/fuubar/tree/legacy .

Thank you so much for your work and sorry for being such a bitch about wanting to support both versions in the same branch. :)

[elia]

Is the legacy branch in some gem?

[jeffkreeftmeijer]

@elia no, I'm sorry. If you use bundler, you can point right to the git url and get it that way: http://gembundler.com/git.html :)

[elia]

@jeffkreeftmeijer yeah I know, if you want I can help
either baking a new fuubar-legacy/fuubar-rspec-1/… gem
or using some specific version strategy…

I thought about forking and pushing the gem, but I prefer to stay official if possible,
let me know your preference :)

[jeffkreeftmeijer]

@elia if you want to create a gem, please go ahead. The reason I never did is because I don't really want to support it anymore. I would accept pull requests for the legacy branch, though. :)

[elia]

Fair enough :)

Since the legacy branch is a fork of v0.2 I think we can publish it as a 0.2.1 with dep set to rspec ~> 1.0
this way no bundler project will be confused :)

I know is less than ideal but make sense to me, letting people from both worlds to gem 'fuubar'

[sdhull]

@elia did you ever push a gemified version of this? We could use such a thing at my office. Pointing to the git repo has presented various issues for my colleagues and some servers.

[elia]

@sdhull Please support the gem creation in issue #26

@jeffkreeftmeijer any update on the 0.1 gem?

[github-actions]

This issue has been closed automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.