-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No "Best of 3" for "Mean of 3" events #109
Comments
Arguably, the option could be useful. Could you get data on how often events have been held in each format in the last few years? If few competitions have used "Best of 3" for a "Mean of 3" event, I think this change should be pretty uncontroversial. |
As long as we clearly state "Mean of 3" as preferred format for these events, it is kind of contradictory that we allow "Best of 3" to be used. There have never been such occurences for 6x6x6 or 7x7x7 so far. These are all occurences: year eventId COUNT(distinct Results.competitionId) SELECT Competitions.year, Results.eventId, COUNT(distinct Results.competitionId) As a note, one should remember that "Best of 3" has been the preferred format for 3x3x3 with feet until 2013. |
That's only 3 out of 106 competitions: CastellonOpen2013 (3 feet competitors), ColombiaTercer2013 (5 feet competitors), and RybnikOpen2013 (5 feet competitors). I think this counts as uncontroversial. |
Required a merge to make compatible with topic #109 (no best of 3 for mean of 3 events).
Proposal
No "Best of 3" for "Mean of 3" events
https://github.com/cubing/wca-documents/compare/no-best-of-3-for-mean-of-3
Pro
Cons
none.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: