resource_manager: add the runaway field for resource group

[CabinfeverB]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #6474

What is changed and how does it work?

add the runaway field for resource group

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test

Release note

None.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• Connor1996
• nolouch

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.27 🎉

Comparison is base (ccb0bba) 74.66% compared to head (53bc6ac) 74.93%.

❗ Current head 53bc6ac differs from pull request most recent head 3cc812c. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3cc812c to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6475      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.66%   74.93%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files         414      411       -3     
  Lines       42323    42032     -291     
==========================================
- Hits        31599    31497     -102     
+ Misses       7936     7759     -177     
+ Partials     2788     2776      -12     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	74.93% <100.00%> (+0.27%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/mcs/resourcemanager/server/resource_group.go	71.27% <100.00%> (+0.94%)	⬆️

... and 38 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[nolouch]

Suggested change

	Runaway *rmpb.RunawaySettings `json:"runaway,omitempty"`
	Runaway *rmpb.RunawaySettings `json:"runaway_settings,omitempty"`

[Connor1996]

LGTM

[CabinfeverB]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@CabinfeverB: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 1686306

[CabinfeverB]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@CabinfeverB: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 9ea6999

[ti-chi-bot]

@CabinfeverB: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.