Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mcs: make scheduling server support operator http interface #7090

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Sep 27, 2023

Conversation

lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor

@lhy1024 lhy1024 commented Sep 13, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #5839

What is changed and how does it work?

It can be reviewed after #7113 and #7120

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

None.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 13, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • HuSharp
  • rleungx

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 13, 2023
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
@lhy1024 lhy1024 marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 09:32
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 21, 2023
@lhy1024 lhy1024 requested review from JmPotato and rleungx and removed request for nolouch and HunDunDM September 21, 2023 09:32
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7090 (5e4559f) into master (eb6953f) will increase coverage by 0.35%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 63.70%.

❗ Current head 5e4559f differs from pull request most recent head b5e8d21. Consider uploading reports for the commit b5e8d21 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7090      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.26%   74.62%   +0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         441      441              
  Lines       47216    47282      +66     
==========================================
+ Hits        35064    35283     +219     
+ Misses       9063     8913     -150     
+ Partials     3089     3086       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.62% <63.70%> (+0.35%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

// @Produce json
// @Success 200 {object} []operator.OpRecord
// @Failure 400 {string} string "The request is invalid."
// @Failure 500 {string} string "PD server failed to proceed the request."
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have it here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is a copy from server/api, maybe we need to fix all other comments too.

@@ -469,6 +469,12 @@ func (s *Server) startWatcher() (err error) {
return err
}

// GetOpts returns the persist config.
// It's used to test.
func (s *Server) GetOpts() *config.PersistConfig {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about using getcluster?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It has not SetPlacementRuleEnabled

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you can add it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will add it in another pr about refactor cluster

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or rename it to GetPersistConfig

server/api/operator.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
// ParseTime parses a time string with the format "1694580288"
func ParseTime(t string) (time.Time, error) {
if len(t) == 0 {
return time.Time{}, nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to return an error?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@lhy1024 lhy1024 Sep 26, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, for http api if there is no "from", it will return all results. I added a comment about it.

@@ -132,10 +132,21 @@ func (suite *apiTestSuite) TestAPIForward() {
re.NoError(err)
re.Len(slice, 0)

err = testutil.ReadGetJSON(re, testDialClient, fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s", urlPrefix, "operators/2"), &resp,
testutil.WithHeader(re, apiutil.ForwardToMicroServiceHeader, "true"))
err = testutil.CheckPostJSON(testDialClient, fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s", urlPrefix, "operators"), []byte(``),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to add a successful get test?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test only tests forward. And a successful get test will be tested in tests/server/api and tests/pdctl.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not also add it here?

tests/server/api/operator_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
from time.Time
err error
)
if froms := r.URL.Query()["from"]; len(froms) > 0 {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to maintain this interface?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure, this pr only keep the same with pd mode.

Copy link
Member

@rleungx rleungx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rest LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 27, 2023
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
default:
return http.StatusBadRequest, nil, errors.Errorf("unknown operator")
}
return http.StatusOK, nil, errors.Errorf("The operator is created.")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does return error here make sense?

c.IndentedJSON(http.StatusOK, records)
}

// FIXME: details of input json body params
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does this mean? 👀

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only copy from previous code

Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>
Copy link
Member

@HuSharp HuSharp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 27, 2023
@lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

lhy1024 commented Sep 27, 2023

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 27, 2023

@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 27, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 5e4559f

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 27, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 27, 2023

@lhy1024: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 7a9e566 into tikv:master Sep 27, 2023
22 checks passed
rleungx pushed a commit to rleungx/pd that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
ref tikv#5839

Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <admin@liudos.us>

Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants