Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

poor cifar100 results #39

Closed
jcpeterson opened this issue Jan 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

poor cifar100 results #39

jcpeterson opened this issue Jan 28, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@jcpeterson
Copy link

The standard cifar100 model only obtains about 60% validation accuracy when letting the standard script run for as many epochs as it wants before stopping early.

@titu1994
Copy link
Owner

Interesting. I have tried Cifar 100 with this model a long time ago and it did get into the 70s at least. I didn't use early stopping though, and ran for 300 epochs, with learning rate halved when there was no improvement after 20 epochs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants