-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Post handshake auth #350
Post handshake auth #350
Conversation
This pull request introduces 9 alerts when merging 1992ced into 849f1d1 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
Comment posted by LGTM.com |
This pull request introduces 9 alerts when merging 68ecf24 into 849f1d1 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
Comment posted by LGTM.com |
68ecf24
to
1c0b1d9
Compare
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 1c0b1d9 into 322f5ff - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
1c0b1d9
to
8133a92
Compare
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 8133a92 into 322f5ff - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
8133a92
to
0e552e6
Compare
This pull request introduces 2 alerts when merging 0e552e6 into 322f5ff - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
0e552e6
to
7e4d7cd
Compare
7e4d7cd
to
1e2e206
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, 3 of 3 files at r2.
Reviewable status: 2 of 5 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ueno)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3.
Reviewable status: 2 of 5 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ueno)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r4, 1 of 1 files at r5.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved
It looks good to me. I was just wondering if |
good point, that actually would be the most portable way of handling required certificate... I'll add it as an option |
since to trigger and finish PHA the client and server needs to read from socket, allow reading 0 bytes, just to trigger buffer processing
1e2e206
to
a609453
Compare
This pull request fixes 3 alerts when merging 114cdd5 into 1abaefe - view on LGTM.com fixed alerts:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r6, 3 of 3 files at r7, 1 of 1 files at r8, 2 of 2 files at r9, 1 of 1 files at r10, 5 of 5 files at r11, 1 of 1 files at r12, 1 of 1 files at r13.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @tomato42)
add support for Post Handshake Authentication (the post_handshake_auth extension)
depends on #196 and #341
fixes #208
TODO
This change is