You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While technically correct (since it's essentially two # characters joined by the horizontal bars), on a quick glance it looks like there are three # signs, instead of two, because an extra # is visible in the middle.
I'd like to propose that the following alternative design be used for the ## sequence, with a joined vertical/diagonal bar in the middle:
I believe the longer sequences, like ### and #### would also greatly benefit from this design change, since right now (IMO) it's really hard to make up the number of # symbols on them at a glance:
Thoughts?
Edit: For reference, here's what their rendering would look like:
(I understand some adjustments need to be done to accommodate for the width, these are just crude mock ups)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now a sequence like
##
is rendered as:While technically correct (since it's essentially two
#
characters joined by the horizontal bars), on a quick glance it looks like there are three#
signs, instead of two, because an extra#
is visible in the middle.I'd like to propose that the following alternative design be used for the
##
sequence, with a joined vertical/diagonal bar in the middle:I believe the longer sequences, like
###
and####
would also greatly benefit from this design change, since right now (IMO) it's really hard to make up the number of#
symbols on them at a glance:Thoughts?
Edit: For reference, here's what their rendering would look like:
(I understand some adjustments need to be done to accommodate for the width, these are just crude mock ups)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: