Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Milestone 10: Authorization with Can Can Can #14

Closed
wants to merge 43 commits into from

Conversation

topeogunleye
Copy link
Owner

Milestone 10: Authorization with Can Can Can

In this Pull Request, I:

  • Installed CanCanCan in your project.
  • Added a role column to the users table. Remember to use a migration for this.
  • A user can delete a post if it is theirs or if they have an admin role (column role has value "admin"). Used CanCanCan for this authorization.
    • For that you need to implement the post deleting functionality. Add the "Delete" button to the view and make sure that only authorized users can see it.
  • A user can delete a comment if it is theirs or if they have an admin role (column role has value "admin"). Use CanCanCan for this authorization.
    • For that you need to implement the comment deleting functionality. Added the "Delete" button to the view and make sure that only authorized users can see it.

Copy link

@KDlamini KDlamini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi team @topeogunleye, @rolandfbk 🙋‍♀️,

Great work so far! 💯
You still need to work on some issues to improve your project according to the requirements. You are almost there! 💪🏾

Highlights 🌞

✔️ Cancancan gem is used
✔️ the Ability class is implemented
✔️ Good PR title and description
✔️ Correct use of Gitflow
✔️ Commit messages are meaningful
✔️ No linter errors

Required Changes ♻️

Kindly look through the comments below 👇 for required changes

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

Cheers 🥂 and Happy coding!!! 👯
Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Remember to tag me @KDlamini in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

Comment on lines 2 to +3
before_action :authenticate_user!, only: %i[create destroy]
load_and_authorize_resource
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am unable to sign up in order to log in and check if the authorization works properly.

image

  • Kindly look into your registration so that we can be able to log in and test for authorization.

Copy link
Owner Author

@topeogunleye topeogunleye Sep 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have fixed it. Please check again

Copy link

@smunozmo smunozmo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @topeogunleye, 👋

Highlights 👏

  • Authorization features are working correctly, congrats! 😎
  • Excellent job making the suggested changes, perfect! 🎉
  • Well done using CanCanCan! ✅
  • Great work using the right GitHub Flow.
  • Your README looks professional, well done!
  • Commits are descriptive, good work.
  • Linters are working properly, great job!

Your project is complete! There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it! 🚀
Very nice work, congratulations! 🎉

APPROVED! 💯 💯 💯

Cheers and Happy coding! 🤓

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

✅ Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@topeogunleye topeogunleye deleted the feature/addAuthorization branch September 2, 2022 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants