Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Milestone 8: Intergration specs #8

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Aug 25, 2022
Merged

Milestone 8: Intergration specs #8

merged 14 commits into from
Aug 25, 2022

Conversation

topeogunleye
Copy link
Owner

@topeogunleye topeogunleye commented Aug 22, 2022

Milestone 8: Integration Tests

  • Added Capybara
  • Added Integration Tests

The Linters pass locally, but fail on GitHub pls

Copy link

@brytebee brytebee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, @topeogunleye👋,

While you made a great effort in this project, unfortunately, I cannot proceed to review your code.

Status: Invalid Code Review Request

You have submitted a project, with failed linters. Kindly fix them and request another review.

Your Code Review Request will be marked as invalid in your Dashboard, so please submit a new one once you are ready 🙏

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me @brytebee in your question so I can receive the notification.

Use @brytebee on slack for faster responses.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


Invalid Code Review Request does not count into the code reviews limit.

@topeogunleye topeogunleye changed the title Intergration specs Milestone 8: Intergration specs Aug 22, 2022
Copy link

@dasileker dasileker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @topeogunleye,

Good job so far!

There are some issues that you still need to work on to go to the next project but you are almost there!

Highlights

  • Linters are green ✅.
  • PR is very detailed✅.
  • The Readme file is very good ✅.
  • Commit are consistent ✅.

Required Changes ♻️

Check the comments under the review.

  • Nice job on adding the test suits but the test is not passing due to the incorrect folder put in so, please relocate the files to the correct spec folder and remove the other and check before sending the PR for review

Capture d’écran 2022-08-22 174502

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

You can also consider:

  • N/A

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@topeogunleye
Copy link
Owner Author

Hi @topeogunleye,

Good job so far!

There are some issues that you still need to work on to go to the next project but you are almost there!

Highlights

  • Linters are green ✅.
  • PR is very detailed✅.
  • The Readme file is very good ✅.
  • Commit are consistent ✅.

Required Changes ♻️

Check the comments under the review.

  • Nice job on adding the test suits but the test is not passing due to the incorrect folder put in so, please relocate the files to the correct spec folder and remove the other and check before sending the PR for review

Capture d’écran 2022-08-22 174502

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

You can also consider:

  • N/A

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear. Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.

As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@dasileker, Please what's the correct folder to put my tests in

@dasileker
Copy link

Hello, like I said you have two folders, do this one is not the correct one, you can refer to this article how to set up rspec

Copy link

@Davidosky007 Davidosky007 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @topeogunleye 👋,

Great work on making the changes requested by a previous reviewer 👏
You've done well implementing some of the requested changes, but there are still some which aren't addressed yet.

Highlights

  • No linter errors 👍
  • Good looking readme file 👍

Required Changes ♻️

Check the comments under the review.

Optional suggestions

Kindly note that this is a paired programming project activity and as such contributions are expected from your partners, please take note as in the future your code review requests would be invalidated. note ✍️ if you have permission from the student success to work solo kindly attach it to your PR so the CR can see it 👍

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix won't stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better. Some of them were simply missed by the previous reviewer and addressing them will improve your application.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me @Davidosky007 in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

Comment on lines 1 to 12
require 'rails_helper'

# Specs in this file have access to a helper object that includes
# the UsersHelper. For example:
#
# describe UsersHelper do
# describe "string concat" do
# it "concats two strings with spaces" do
# expect(helper.concat_strings("this","that")).to eq("this that")
# end
# end
# end

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • I get an error here when i run rspec kindly fix this error HINT 💭 I tried commenting out lines 13 to 15 and got some test passing but 3tests were still failing below is the screenshot of the new error i got after modifying this file
    image

new error

image

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Davidosky007 This file is not a part pf the tests

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know that but if any visitor of your repo decides to run your test they will definitely have that error

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. Thank you for explaining @Davidosky007

Copy link

@emmanuellekamwa emmanuellekamwa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

STATUS: APPROVED 🍾✔🎉
Hello @topeogunleye 👋
Your project is complete! There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it :shipit:
Congratulations! 🎉

Highlights

  • You documented your work professionally.✔
  • Your linters are passing all the checks
  • You asked for the changes in a polite and friendly way.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

Copy link

@alexander16108 alexander16108 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @topeogunleye ,

Your project is complete! There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it :shipit:
Congratulations! 🎉

sorry for the inconvenience experienced 💯

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix won't stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better. Some of them were simply missed by the previous reviewer and addressing them will really improve your application.

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@topeogunleye topeogunleye merged commit c132fd8 into develop Aug 25, 2022
@topeogunleye topeogunleye deleted the intergrationSpecs branch August 25, 2022 05:24
@emmanuellekamwa
Copy link

emmanuellekamwa commented Oct 11, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants