-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #146
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update linux Repository
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2015
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
laijs
pushed a commit
to laijs/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2017
…move lkl: return 0 in lkl_netdevs_remove in tools/lkl/lib/nt-host.c
wzyy2
pushed a commit
to wzyy2/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2017
drm mm is not initial on non-iommu context. Fix crash: [ 11.635376] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 11.636148] pgd = ffffffc0de19d000 [ 11.636474] [00000000] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000 [ 11.637088] Internal error: Oops: 96000045 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 11.637594] Modules linked in: [ 11.637902] CPU: 4 PID: 424 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.4.71 torvalds#146 [ 11.638406] Hardware name: Rockchip RK3399 Evaluation Board v3 (Android) (DT) [ 11.639050] task: ffffffc0de796800 ti: ffffffc0de260000 task.ti: ffffffc0de260000 [ 11.639736] PC is at __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa8/0x178 [ 11.640198] LR is at __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x7c/0x178 [ 11.788003] [<ffffff8008b85b5c>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa8/0x178 [ 11.788560] [<ffffff8008b85c58>] mutex_lock+0x2c/0x44 [ 11.789024] [<ffffff800849e8d8>] rockchip_drm_mm_dump+0x30/0x5c [ 11.789560] [<ffffff80081d612c>] seq_read+0x1a8/0x3f8 [ 11.790017] [<ffffff80081b4208>] __vfs_read+0x38/0xf4 [ 11.790472] [<ffffff80081b4adc>] vfs_read+0x84/0x128 [ 11.790927] [<ffffff80081b552c>] SyS_read+0x54/0xa4 [ 11.791372] [<ffffff80080828b0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28 Change-Id: I342311da43d50b743257b81425dfc6a327306803 Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
ruscur
pushed a commit
to ruscur/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2019
syzbot found the following crash: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880a5cf2c50 by task syz-executor.0/26173 CPU: 0 PID: 26173 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6 torvalds#146 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_address_description.cold+0xd4/0x306 mm/kasan/report.c:351 __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x36 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0x12/0x17 mm/kasan/common.c:618 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/generic_report.c:132 perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:13 [inline] lock_acquire+0x2de/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4411 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] shmem_fault+0x5ec/0x7b0 mm/shmem.c:2034 __do_fault+0x111/0x540 mm/memory.c:3083 do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:3535 [inline] do_fault mm/memory.c:3613 [inline] handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3840 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x2adf/0x3f20 mm/memory.c:3964 handle_mm_fault+0x1b5/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:4001 do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1441 [inline] __do_page_fault+0x536/0xdd0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1506 do_page_fault+0x38/0x590 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1530 page_fault+0x39/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1202 It happens if the VMA got unmapped under us while we dropped mmap_sem and inode got freed. Pinning the file if we drop mmap_sem fixes the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927083908.rhifa4mmaxefc24r@box Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: syzbot+03ee87124ee05af991bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
ruscur
pushed a commit
to ruscur/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2019
syzbot found the following crash: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880a5cf2c50 by task syz-executor.0/26173 CPU: 0 PID: 26173 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6 torvalds#146 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_address_description.cold+0xd4/0x306 mm/kasan/report.c:351 __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x36 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0x12/0x17 mm/kasan/common.c:618 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/generic_report.c:132 perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:13 [inline] lock_acquire+0x2de/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4411 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] shmem_fault+0x5ec/0x7b0 mm/shmem.c:2034 __do_fault+0x111/0x540 mm/memory.c:3083 do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:3535 [inline] do_fault mm/memory.c:3613 [inline] handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3840 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x2adf/0x3f20 mm/memory.c:3964 handle_mm_fault+0x1b5/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:4001 do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1441 [inline] __do_page_fault+0x536/0xdd0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1506 do_page_fault+0x38/0x590 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1530 page_fault+0x39/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1202 It happens if the VMA got unmapped under us while we dropped mmap_sem and inode got freed. Pinning the file if we drop mmap_sem fixes the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927083908.rhifa4mmaxefc24r@box Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: syzbot+03ee87124ee05af991bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
ruscur
pushed a commit
to ruscur/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2019
syzbot found the following crash: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880a5cf2c50 by task syz-executor.0/26173 CPU: 0 PID: 26173 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6 torvalds#146 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_address_description.cold+0xd4/0x306 mm/kasan/report.c:351 __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x36 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0x12/0x17 mm/kasan/common.c:618 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/generic_report.c:132 perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:13 [inline] lock_acquire+0x2de/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4411 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] shmem_fault+0x5ec/0x7b0 mm/shmem.c:2034 __do_fault+0x111/0x540 mm/memory.c:3083 do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:3535 [inline] do_fault mm/memory.c:3613 [inline] handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3840 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x2adf/0x3f20 mm/memory.c:3964 handle_mm_fault+0x1b5/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:4001 do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1441 [inline] __do_page_fault+0x536/0xdd0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1506 do_page_fault+0x38/0x590 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1530 page_fault+0x39/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1202 It happens if the VMA got unmapped under us while we dropped mmap_sem and inode got freed. Pinning the file if we drop mmap_sem fixes the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927083908.rhifa4mmaxefc24r@box Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: syzbot+03ee87124ee05af991bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
torvalds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2019
syzbot found the following crash: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880a5cf2c50 by task syz-executor.0/26173 CPU: 0 PID: 26173 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6 #146 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:13 [inline] lock_acquire+0x2de/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4411 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] shmem_fault+0x5ec/0x7b0 mm/shmem.c:2034 __do_fault+0x111/0x540 mm/memory.c:3083 do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:3535 [inline] do_fault mm/memory.c:3613 [inline] handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3840 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x2adf/0x3f20 mm/memory.c:3964 handle_mm_fault+0x1b5/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:4001 do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1441 [inline] __do_page_fault+0x536/0xdd0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1506 do_page_fault+0x38/0x590 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1530 page_fault+0x39/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1202 It happens if the VMA got unmapped under us while we dropped mmap_sem and inode got freed. Pinning the file if we drop mmap_sem fixes the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927083908.rhifa4mmaxefc24r@box Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: syzbot+03ee87124ee05af991bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
snajpa
pushed a commit
to vpsfreecz/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2020
[ Upstream commit 8897c1b ] syzbot found the following crash: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880a5cf2c50 by task syz-executor.0/26173 CPU: 0 PID: 26173 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6 torvalds#146 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:13 [inline] lock_acquire+0x2de/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4411 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] shmem_fault+0x5ec/0x7b0 mm/shmem.c:2034 __do_fault+0x111/0x540 mm/memory.c:3083 do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:3535 [inline] do_fault mm/memory.c:3613 [inline] handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3840 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x2adf/0x3f20 mm/memory.c:3964 handle_mm_fault+0x1b5/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:4001 do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1441 [inline] __do_page_fault+0x536/0xdd0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1506 do_page_fault+0x38/0x590 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1530 page_fault+0x39/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1202 It happens if the VMA got unmapped under us while we dropped mmap_sem and inode got freed. Pinning the file if we drop mmap_sem fixes the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927083908.rhifa4mmaxefc24r@box Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: syzbot+03ee87124ee05af991bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gabrielesvelto
pushed a commit
to gabrielesvelto/CI20_linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2020
[ Upstream commit 398f013 ] Since commit fc62814 ("net/packet: fix 4gb buffer limit due to overflow check") one can now allocate packet ring buffers >= UINT_MAX. However, syzkaller found that that triggers a warning: [ 21.100000] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2075 at mm/page_alloc.c:4584 __alloc_pages_nod0 [ 21.101490] Modules linked in: [ 21.101921] CPU: 2 PID: 2075 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.0.0 torvalds#146 [ 21.102784] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 [ 21.103887] RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2a0/0x630 [ 21.104640] Code: fe ff ff 65 48 8b 04 25 c0 de 01 00 48 05 90 0f 00 00 41 bd 01 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 48 e9 9c fe 3 [ 21.107121] RSP: 0018:ffff88805e1cf920 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 21.107819] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff85a488a0 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 21.108753] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 21.109699] RBP: 1ffff1100bc39f28 R08: ffffed100bcefb67 R09: ffffed100bcefb67 [ 21.110646] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed100bcefb66 R12: 000000000000000d [ 21.111623] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88805e77d888 R15: 000000000000000d [ 21.112552] FS: 00007f7c7de05700(0000) GS:ffff88806d100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 21.113612] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 21.114405] CR2: 000000000065c000 CR3: 000000005e58e006 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 21.115367] Call Trace: [ 21.115705] ? __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x21c0/0x21c0 [ 21.116362] alloc_pages_current+0xac/0x1e0 [ 21.116923] kmalloc_order+0x18/0x70 [ 21.117393] kmalloc_order_trace+0x18/0x110 [ 21.117949] packet_set_ring+0x9d5/0x1770 [ 21.118524] ? packet_rcv_spkt+0x440/0x440 [ 21.119094] ? lock_downgrade+0x620/0x620 [ 21.119646] ? __might_fault+0x177/0x1b0 [ 21.120177] packet_setsockopt+0x981/0x2940 [ 21.120753] ? __fget+0x2fb/0x4b0 [ 21.121209] ? packet_release+0xab0/0xab0 [ 21.121740] ? sock_has_perm+0x1cd/0x260 [ 21.122297] ? selinux_secmark_relabel_packet+0xd0/0xd0 [ 21.123013] ? __fget+0x324/0x4b0 [ 21.123451] ? selinux_netlbl_socket_setsockopt+0x101/0x320 [ 21.124186] ? selinux_netlbl_sock_rcv_skb+0x3a0/0x3a0 [ 21.124908] ? __lock_acquire+0x529/0x3200 [ 21.125453] ? selinux_socket_setsockopt+0x5d/0x70 [ 21.126075] ? __sys_setsockopt+0x131/0x210 [ 21.126533] ? packet_release+0xab0/0xab0 [ 21.127004] __sys_setsockopt+0x131/0x210 [ 21.127449] ? kernel_accept+0x2f0/0x2f0 [ 21.127911] ? ret_from_fork+0x8/0x50 [ 21.128313] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x11b/0x280 [ 21.128800] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xba/0x150 [ 21.129271] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x37f/0x560 [ 21.129769] do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x450 [ 21.130182] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe We should allocate with __GFP_NOWARN to handle this. Cc: Kal Conley <kal.conley@dectris.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Fixes: fc62814 ("net/packet: fix 4gb buffer limit due to overflow check") Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jackpot51
referenced
this pull request
in pop-os/linux
Mar 13, 2020
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861710 [ Upstream commit 8897c1b ] syzbot found the following crash: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880a5cf2c50 by task syz-executor.0/26173 CPU: 0 PID: 26173 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6 #146 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: perf_trace_lock_acquire+0x401/0x530 include/trace/events/lock.h:13 trace_lock_acquire include/trace/events/lock.h:13 [inline] lock_acquire+0x2de/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4411 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] shmem_fault+0x5ec/0x7b0 mm/shmem.c:2034 __do_fault+0x111/0x540 mm/memory.c:3083 do_shared_fault mm/memory.c:3535 [inline] do_fault mm/memory.c:3613 [inline] handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3840 [inline] __handle_mm_fault+0x2adf/0x3f20 mm/memory.c:3964 handle_mm_fault+0x1b5/0x6b0 mm/memory.c:4001 do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1441 [inline] __do_page_fault+0x536/0xdd0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1506 do_page_fault+0x38/0x590 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1530 page_fault+0x39/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1202 It happens if the VMA got unmapped under us while we dropped mmap_sem and inode got freed. Pinning the file if we drop mmap_sem fixes the issue. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190927083908.rhifa4mmaxefc24r@box Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: syzbot+03ee87124ee05af991bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2020
scripts/checkpatch.pl reports following warning for patch ("bcache: check and adjust logical block size for backing devices"), WARNING: quoted string split across lines torvalds#146: FILE: drivers/md/bcache/super.c:896: + pr_info("%s: sb/logical block size (%u) greater than page size " + "(%lu) falling back to device logical block size (%u)", There are two things to fix up, - The kernel message print should be in a single line. - pr_info() won't automatically add new line since v5.8, a '\n' should be added. This patch just does the above cleanup in bcache_device_init(). Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Gnurou
pushed a commit
to Gnurou/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2020
Since pm_qos_add_request() creates a work queue, the pm_qos_request argument should be heap allocated. Otherwise, the following warning will be logged when the CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS config option is enabled: [ 3.456876] ODEBUG: object 0000000004de3844 is on stack 000000004553414d, but NOT annotated. [ 3.457101] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.457142] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at lib/debugobjects.c:368 __debug_object_init+0x374/0x4c8 [ 3.457150] Modules linked in: [ 3.457162] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.139 torvalds#146 [ 3.457169] Hardware name: Google Elm (DT) [ 3.457178] pstate: 60000085 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO) [ 3.457187] pc : __debug_object_init+0x374/0x4c8 [ 3.457195] lr : __debug_object_init+0x374/0x4c8 [ 3.457202] sp : ffffffc0daf2f770 [ 3.457210] x29: ffffffc0daf2f780 x28: ffffff900a4b0000 [ 3.457219] x27: ffffff900a4ae0c8 x26: dead000000000100 [ 3.457228] x25: ffffff9009691000 x24: ffffffc0d1b4e7b0 [ 3.457237] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffff900a4ae0d0 [ 3.457246] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffffffc0daf2f8b0 [ 3.457254] x19: ffffff9009642d68 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 3.457262] x17: ffffff9009649000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 3.457271] x15: ffffff90085412b8 x14: 0000000000000001 [ 3.457279] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000000c0001 [ 3.457287] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 3.457296] x9 : 0f00a3cfd965a500 x8 : 0f00a3cfd965a500 [ 3.457304] x7 : ffffff900817190c x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 3.457313] x5 : 0000000000000080 x4 : 0000000000000001 [ 3.457321] x3 : ffffffc0daf2f474 x2 : 0000000000000002 [ 3.457329] x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : 0000000000000024 [ 3.457338] Call trace: [ 3.457347] __debug_object_init+0x374/0x4c8 [ 3.457355] debug_object_init+0x1c/0x24 [ 3.457365] __init_work+0x34/0x40 [ 3.457373] pm_qos_add_request+0x58/0x23c [ 3.457383] mtk_svs_late_init+0x220/0x664 [ 3.457391] do_one_initcall+0x1d8/0x40c [ 3.457401] do_initcall_level+0x1f0/0x244 [ 3.457408] do_basic_setup+0x64/0x7c [ 3.457416] kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x198 [ 3.457425] kernel_init+0x14/0x100 [ 3.457433] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 BUG=b:160960149 TEST=Boot elm with USE=debug, warning not seen in dmesg Change-Id: Ice6cd351ead586ad3393d6be83b52be3a8b190da Signed-off-by: Anand K Mistry <amistry@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2366252 Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Anand K Mistry <amistry@chromium.org> Tested-by: Anand K Mistry <amistry@chromium.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2020
mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id may be called in interrupt context, so we need to use GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory to avoid sleeping in atomic context. [ 280.209809] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498 [ 280.209812] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1680, name: kworker/1:3 [ 280.209814] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 280.209816] CPU: 1 PID: 1680 Comm: kworker/1:3 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-mptcp+ torvalds#146 [ 280.209818] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 280.209820] Workqueue: events mptcp_worker [ 280.209822] Call Trace: [ 280.209824] <IRQ> [ 280.209826] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 280.209829] ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6 [ 280.209832] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1d1/0x290 [ 280.209835] mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id+0x23c/0x410 [ 280.209840] subflow_init_req+0x1e9/0x2ea [ 280.209843] ? inet_reqsk_alloc+0x1c/0x120 [ 280.209845] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x264/0x290 [ 280.209849] tcp_conn_request+0x303/0xae0 [ 280.209854] ? printk+0x53/0x6a [ 280.209857] ? tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209859] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209864] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209866] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209869] tcp_v4_rcv+0xed6/0xfa0 [ 280.209873] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x28/0x270 [ 280.209875] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x89/0x120 [ 280.209877] ip_local_deliver+0x180/0x220 [ 280.209881] ip_rcv+0x166/0x210 [ 280.209885] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x82/0x90 [ 280.209888] process_backlog+0xd6/0x230 [ 280.209891] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x410 [ 280.209895] __do_softirq+0xcf/0x468 [ 280.209899] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 280.209901] </IRQ> [ 280.209903] ? ip_finish_output2+0x240/0x9a0 [ 280.209906] do_softirq_own_stack+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209908] do_softirq.part.0+0x2b/0x60 [ 280.209911] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9a/0xa0 [ 280.209913] ip_finish_output2+0x264/0x9a0 [ 280.209916] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209920] ? ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209922] ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209925] ? __ip_finish_output+0x330/0x330 [ 280.209928] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 280.209931] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xa0f/0xc70 [ 280.209937] tcp_connect+0xb03/0xff0 [ 280.209939] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209942] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x125/0x150 [ 280.209944] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 [ 280.209948] tcp_v4_connect+0x449/0x550 [ 280.209953] __inet_stream_connect+0xbb/0x320 [ 280.209955] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 280.209958] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209960] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6b/0xa0 [ 280.209963] inet_stream_connect+0x32/0x50 [ 280.209966] __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1fd/0x242 [ 280.209972] mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr+0x2db/0x600 [ 280.209975] mptcp_worker+0x543/0x7a0 [ 280.209980] process_one_work+0x26d/0x5b0 [ 280.209984] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209987] worker_thread+0x48/0x3d0 [ 280.209990] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209993] kthread+0x117/0x150 [ 280.209996] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 280.209998] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fixes: 01cacb0 ("mptcp: add netlink-based PM") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2020
mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id may be called in interrupt context, so we need to use GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory to avoid sleeping in atomic context. [ 280.209809] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498 [ 280.209812] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1680, name: kworker/1:3 [ 280.209814] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 280.209816] CPU: 1 PID: 1680 Comm: kworker/1:3 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-mptcp+ torvalds#146 [ 280.209818] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 280.209820] Workqueue: events mptcp_worker [ 280.209822] Call Trace: [ 280.209824] <IRQ> [ 280.209826] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 280.209829] ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6 [ 280.209832] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1d1/0x290 [ 280.209835] mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id+0x23c/0x410 [ 280.209840] subflow_init_req+0x1e9/0x2ea [ 280.209843] ? inet_reqsk_alloc+0x1c/0x120 [ 280.209845] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x264/0x290 [ 280.209849] tcp_conn_request+0x303/0xae0 [ 280.209854] ? printk+0x53/0x6a [ 280.209857] ? tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209859] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209864] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209866] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209869] tcp_v4_rcv+0xed6/0xfa0 [ 280.209873] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x28/0x270 [ 280.209875] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x89/0x120 [ 280.209877] ip_local_deliver+0x180/0x220 [ 280.209881] ip_rcv+0x166/0x210 [ 280.209885] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x82/0x90 [ 280.209888] process_backlog+0xd6/0x230 [ 280.209891] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x410 [ 280.209895] __do_softirq+0xcf/0x468 [ 280.209899] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 280.209901] </IRQ> [ 280.209903] ? ip_finish_output2+0x240/0x9a0 [ 280.209906] do_softirq_own_stack+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209908] do_softirq.part.0+0x2b/0x60 [ 280.209911] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9a/0xa0 [ 280.209913] ip_finish_output2+0x264/0x9a0 [ 280.209916] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209920] ? ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209922] ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209925] ? __ip_finish_output+0x330/0x330 [ 280.209928] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 280.209931] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xa0f/0xc70 [ 280.209937] tcp_connect+0xb03/0xff0 [ 280.209939] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209942] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x125/0x150 [ 280.209944] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 [ 280.209948] tcp_v4_connect+0x449/0x550 [ 280.209953] __inet_stream_connect+0xbb/0x320 [ 280.209955] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 280.209958] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209960] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6b/0xa0 [ 280.209963] inet_stream_connect+0x32/0x50 [ 280.209966] __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1fd/0x242 [ 280.209972] mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr+0x2db/0x600 [ 280.209975] mptcp_worker+0x543/0x7a0 [ 280.209980] process_one_work+0x26d/0x5b0 [ 280.209984] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209987] worker_thread+0x48/0x3d0 [ 280.209990] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209993] kthread+0x117/0x150 [ 280.209996] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 280.209998] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fixes: 01cacb0 ("mptcp: add netlink-based PM") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2020
mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id may be called in interrupt context, so we need to use GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory to avoid sleeping in atomic context. [ 280.209809] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498 [ 280.209812] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1680, name: kworker/1:3 [ 280.209814] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 280.209816] CPU: 1 PID: 1680 Comm: kworker/1:3 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-mptcp+ torvalds#146 [ 280.209818] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 280.209820] Workqueue: events mptcp_worker [ 280.209822] Call Trace: [ 280.209824] <IRQ> [ 280.209826] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 280.209829] ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6 [ 280.209832] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1d1/0x290 [ 280.209835] mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id+0x23c/0x410 [ 280.209840] subflow_init_req+0x1e9/0x2ea [ 280.209843] ? inet_reqsk_alloc+0x1c/0x120 [ 280.209845] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x264/0x290 [ 280.209849] tcp_conn_request+0x303/0xae0 [ 280.209854] ? printk+0x53/0x6a [ 280.209857] ? tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209859] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209864] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209866] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209869] tcp_v4_rcv+0xed6/0xfa0 [ 280.209873] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x28/0x270 [ 280.209875] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x89/0x120 [ 280.209877] ip_local_deliver+0x180/0x220 [ 280.209881] ip_rcv+0x166/0x210 [ 280.209885] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x82/0x90 [ 280.209888] process_backlog+0xd6/0x230 [ 280.209891] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x410 [ 280.209895] __do_softirq+0xcf/0x468 [ 280.209899] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 280.209901] </IRQ> [ 280.209903] ? ip_finish_output2+0x240/0x9a0 [ 280.209906] do_softirq_own_stack+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209908] do_softirq.part.0+0x2b/0x60 [ 280.209911] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9a/0xa0 [ 280.209913] ip_finish_output2+0x264/0x9a0 [ 280.209916] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209920] ? ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209922] ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209925] ? __ip_finish_output+0x330/0x330 [ 280.209928] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 280.209931] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xa0f/0xc70 [ 280.209937] tcp_connect+0xb03/0xff0 [ 280.209939] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209942] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x125/0x150 [ 280.209944] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 [ 280.209948] tcp_v4_connect+0x449/0x550 [ 280.209953] __inet_stream_connect+0xbb/0x320 [ 280.209955] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 280.209958] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209960] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6b/0xa0 [ 280.209963] inet_stream_connect+0x32/0x50 [ 280.209966] __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1fd/0x242 [ 280.209972] mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr+0x2db/0x600 [ 280.209975] mptcp_worker+0x543/0x7a0 [ 280.209980] process_one_work+0x26d/0x5b0 [ 280.209984] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209987] worker_thread+0x48/0x3d0 [ 280.209990] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209993] kthread+0x117/0x150 [ 280.209996] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 280.209998] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fixes: 01cacb0 ("mptcp: add netlink-based PM") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2020
mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id may be called in interrupt context, so we need to use GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory to avoid sleeping in atomic context. [ 280.209809] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498 [ 280.209812] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1680, name: kworker/1:3 [ 280.209814] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 280.209816] CPU: 1 PID: 1680 Comm: kworker/1:3 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-mptcp+ torvalds#146 [ 280.209818] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 280.209820] Workqueue: events mptcp_worker [ 280.209822] Call Trace: [ 280.209824] <IRQ> [ 280.209826] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 280.209829] ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6 [ 280.209832] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1d1/0x290 [ 280.209835] mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id+0x23c/0x410 [ 280.209840] subflow_init_req+0x1e9/0x2ea [ 280.209843] ? inet_reqsk_alloc+0x1c/0x120 [ 280.209845] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x264/0x290 [ 280.209849] tcp_conn_request+0x303/0xae0 [ 280.209854] ? printk+0x53/0x6a [ 280.209857] ? tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209859] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209864] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209866] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209869] tcp_v4_rcv+0xed6/0xfa0 [ 280.209873] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x28/0x270 [ 280.209875] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x89/0x120 [ 280.209877] ip_local_deliver+0x180/0x220 [ 280.209881] ip_rcv+0x166/0x210 [ 280.209885] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x82/0x90 [ 280.209888] process_backlog+0xd6/0x230 [ 280.209891] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x410 [ 280.209895] __do_softirq+0xcf/0x468 [ 280.209899] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 280.209901] </IRQ> [ 280.209903] ? ip_finish_output2+0x240/0x9a0 [ 280.209906] do_softirq_own_stack+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209908] do_softirq.part.0+0x2b/0x60 [ 280.209911] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9a/0xa0 [ 280.209913] ip_finish_output2+0x264/0x9a0 [ 280.209916] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209920] ? ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209922] ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209925] ? __ip_finish_output+0x330/0x330 [ 280.209928] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 280.209931] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xa0f/0xc70 [ 280.209937] tcp_connect+0xb03/0xff0 [ 280.209939] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209942] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x125/0x150 [ 280.209944] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 [ 280.209948] tcp_v4_connect+0x449/0x550 [ 280.209953] __inet_stream_connect+0xbb/0x320 [ 280.209955] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 280.209958] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209960] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6b/0xa0 [ 280.209963] inet_stream_connect+0x32/0x50 [ 280.209966] __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1fd/0x242 [ 280.209972] mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr+0x2db/0x600 [ 280.209975] mptcp_worker+0x543/0x7a0 [ 280.209980] process_one_work+0x26d/0x5b0 [ 280.209984] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209987] worker_thread+0x48/0x3d0 [ 280.209990] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209993] kthread+0x117/0x150 [ 280.209996] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 280.209998] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fixes: 01cacb0 ("mptcp: add netlink-based PM") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2020
mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id may be called in interrupt context, so we need to use GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory to avoid sleeping in atomic context. [ 280.209809] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:498 [ 280.209812] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1680, name: kworker/1:3 [ 280.209814] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 280.209816] CPU: 1 PID: 1680 Comm: kworker/1:3 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-mptcp+ torvalds#146 [ 280.209818] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [ 280.209820] Workqueue: events mptcp_worker [ 280.209822] Call Trace: [ 280.209824] <IRQ> [ 280.209826] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 280.209829] ___might_sleep.cold+0xa6/0xb6 [ 280.209832] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1d1/0x290 [ 280.209835] mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id+0x23c/0x410 [ 280.209840] subflow_init_req+0x1e9/0x2ea [ 280.209843] ? inet_reqsk_alloc+0x1c/0x120 [ 280.209845] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x264/0x290 [ 280.209849] tcp_conn_request+0x303/0xae0 [ 280.209854] ? printk+0x53/0x6a [ 280.209857] ? tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209859] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x28f/0x1374 [ 280.209864] ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209866] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 280.209869] tcp_v4_rcv+0xed6/0xfa0 [ 280.209873] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x28/0x270 [ 280.209875] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x89/0x120 [ 280.209877] ip_local_deliver+0x180/0x220 [ 280.209881] ip_rcv+0x166/0x210 [ 280.209885] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x82/0x90 [ 280.209888] process_backlog+0xd6/0x230 [ 280.209891] net_rx_action+0x13a/0x410 [ 280.209895] __do_softirq+0xcf/0x468 [ 280.209899] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 280.209901] </IRQ> [ 280.209903] ? ip_finish_output2+0x240/0x9a0 [ 280.209906] do_softirq_own_stack+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209908] do_softirq.part.0+0x2b/0x60 [ 280.209911] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x9a/0xa0 [ 280.209913] ip_finish_output2+0x264/0x9a0 [ 280.209916] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x4d/0x60 [ 280.209920] ? ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209922] ip_output+0x7a/0x250 [ 280.209925] ? __ip_finish_output+0x330/0x330 [ 280.209928] __ip_queue_xmit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 280.209931] __tcp_transmit_skb+0xa0f/0xc70 [ 280.209937] tcp_connect+0xb03/0xff0 [ 280.209939] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209942] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x125/0x150 [ 280.209944] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 [ 280.209948] tcp_v4_connect+0x449/0x550 [ 280.209953] __inet_stream_connect+0xbb/0x320 [ 280.209955] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 [ 280.209958] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xe7/0x190 [ 280.209960] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6b/0xa0 [ 280.209963] inet_stream_connect+0x32/0x50 [ 280.209966] __mptcp_subflow_connect+0x1fd/0x242 [ 280.209972] mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr+0x2db/0x600 [ 280.209975] mptcp_worker+0x543/0x7a0 [ 280.209980] process_one_work+0x26d/0x5b0 [ 280.209984] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209987] worker_thread+0x48/0x3d0 [ 280.209990] ? process_one_work+0x5b0/0x5b0 [ 280.209993] kthread+0x117/0x150 [ 280.209996] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 280.209998] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fixes: 01cacb0 ("mptcp: add netlink-based PM") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#132: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:132: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#133: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:133: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#134: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:134: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#135: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:135: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#136: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:136: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#137: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:137: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#138: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:138: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#139: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:139: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#140: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:140: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#142: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:142: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#144: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:144: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#145: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:145: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#146: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:146: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#147: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:147: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#132: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:132: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#133: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:133: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#134: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:134: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#135: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:135: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#136: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:136: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#137: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:137: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#138: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:138: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#139: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:139: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#140: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:140: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#142: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:142: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#144: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:144: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#145: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:145: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#146: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:146: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#147: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:147: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-6-marcocesati@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2022
PD#150078: driver defect clean up: torvalds#14 torvalds#89 torvalds#111 torvalds#124 torvalds#133 torvalds#136 torvalds#137 torvalds#146 torvalds#148 torvalds#150 torvalds#153 Change-Id: I734a66a8b92a0dc57a232879463a3fc074534fa0 Signed-off-by: Zongdong Jiao <zongdong.jiao@amlogic.com>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
PD#150078: driver defect clean up: torvalds#14 torvalds#89 torvalds#111 torvalds#124 torvalds#133 torvalds#136 torvalds#137 torvalds#146 torvalds#148 torvalds#150 torvalds#153 Change-Id: I734a66a8b92a0dc57a232879463a3fc074534fa0 Signed-off-by: Zongdong Jiao <zongdong.jiao@amlogic.com>
mj22226
pushed a commit
to mj22226/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
Associate the mac address with the board. Signed-off-by: Stephen Chen <stephen@radxa.com>
rpardini
pushed a commit
to rpardini/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2024
* arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: add power led and user led Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify vbus5v0_typec enable gpio Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: add pwm-fan node Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify bt gpio pinctrl Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify dp sound card name Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock5 itx: remove useless node Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock5 itx: add hdmi0_phy_pll Fix dp0 display abnormality when hdmi1 and dp0 are displayed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify hp_det pinctrl pull down Since F_AUDIO's headphones don't have a detect pin, force the detect pin low. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> * arm64: dts: rock5itx: enable vdd_0v75_s0 when suspend Fix automatic wakeup after suspend. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com> Co-authored-by: Ken Wang <ken@radxa.com>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2024
The memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [yanfei.xu@intel.com: add mutex_lock/unlock() pair back] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240830102447.1445296-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update linux Repository