Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal integration FN+F9 for KeyboardBacklight #541

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Proposal integration FN+F9 for KeyboardBacklight #541

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

webghostx
Copy link

when trying to turn on the keyboard light FN+F9
''' [ 775.626810] acer_wmi: Unknown key number - 0x84 '''

when trying to turn on the keyboard light FN+F9
''' [  775.626810] acer_wmi: Unknown key number - 0x84 '''
@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @webghostx!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#535: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:535:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#536: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:536:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bWifiOnly);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#537: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:537:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#538: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:538:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#539: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:539:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#540: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:540:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#541: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:541:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 action);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#543: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:543:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, enum RT_MEDIA_STATUS mediaStatus

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#545: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:545:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pktType);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#547: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:547:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#549: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:549:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#550: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:550:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#551: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:551:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#555: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:555:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_DisplayBtCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors:

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#535: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:535:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#536: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:536:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 bWifiOnly);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#537: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:537:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#538: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:538:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#539: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:539:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#540: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:540:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#541: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:541:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 action);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#543: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:543:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, enum RT_MEDIA_STATUS mediaStatus

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#545: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:545:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pktType);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#547: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:547:
    +	struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#549: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:549:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#550: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:550:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#551: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:551:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

    ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
    torvalds#555: FILE: ./hal/HalBtcOutSrc.h:555:
    +void EXhalbtcoutsrc_DisplayBtCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist);

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-7-marcocesati@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2021
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request May 27, 2023
There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
So just remove 'WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))'
in dqgrab().

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2023
There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
akiyks pushed a commit to akiyks/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2023
There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tombriden pushed a commit to tombriden/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ThatsItForTheOtherOne pushed a commit to Wii-Linux/wii-linux-ngx that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51
dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted
6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget

atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B,
&dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't
set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B,
&dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal
when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in
invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[uli: backport to 4.4]
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <uli@kernel.org>
bsbernd pushed a commit to DDNStorage/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2023
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037005

[ Upstream commit d6a95db ]

There's issue as follows when do fault injection:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14870 at include/linux/quotaops.h:51 dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14870 Comm: fsconfig Not tainted 6.3.0-next-20230505-00006-g5107a9c821af-dirty torvalds#541
RIP: 0010:dquot_disable+0x13b7/0x18c0
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000acc79e0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88825e41b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88825e41b980 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179f68000 R08: ffffffff82087ca7 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed102f3ed026 R12: ffff888179f68130
R13: ffff888179f68110 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff888179f68118
FS:  00007f450a073740(0000) GS:ffff88882fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffe96f2efd8 CR3: 000000025c8ad000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dquot_load_quota_sb+0xd53/0x1060
 dquot_resume+0x172/0x230
 ext4_reconfigure+0x1dc6/0x27b0
 reconfigure_super+0x515/0xa90
 __x64_sys_fsconfig+0xb19/0xd20
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Above issue may happens as follows:
ProcessA              ProcessB                    ProcessC
sys_fsconfig
  vfs_fsconfig_locked
   reconfigure_super
     ext4_remount
      dquot_suspend -> suspend all type quota

                 sys_fsconfig
                  vfs_fsconfig_locked
                    reconfigure_super
                     ext4_remount
                      dquot_resume
                       ret = dquot_load_quota_sb
                        add_dquot_ref
                                           do_open  -> open file O_RDWR
                                            vfs_open
                                             do_dentry_open
                                              get_write_access
                                               atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount)
                                              ext4_file_open
                                               dquot_file_open
                                                dquot_initialize
                                                  __dquot_initialize
                                                   dqget
						    atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);

                          __dquot_initialize
                           __dquot_initialize
                            dqget
                             if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
                               ext4_acquire_dquot
			        -> Return error DQ_ACTIVE_B flag isn't set
                         dquot_disable
			  invalidate_dquots
			   if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
	                    dqgrab
			     WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
	                      -> Trigger warning

In the above scenario, 'dquot->dq_flags' has no DQ_ACTIVE_B is normal when
dqgrab().
To solve above issue just replace the dqgrab() use in invalidate_dquots() with
atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count).

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230605140731.2427629-3-yebin10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
@webghostx webghostx closed this by deleting the head repository Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants