Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tools(crowtty): Support "framed" and "stream" port modes #90

Open
jamesmunns opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

tools(crowtty): Support "framed" and "stream" port modes #90

jamesmunns opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
area: protocols Related to communication protocols, including SerMux and Traceproto. area: tools & build Related to host developer tools, including tracing, Crowtty and build processes kind: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jamesmunns
Copy link
Contributor

We could get rid of "cobs on cobs" framing for things like tracing (introduced in #80) by supporting "framed" ports, where "one wire frame == one app frame".

Right now, all ports are streams (like TCP), this would introduce a separate kind of port you could open that is natively framed (like UDP). We could do this by going from 16 bit ports to 1b mode + 15b ports, or making the crowtty frame header a little larger.
@hawkw hawkw added the kind: enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2023
@hawkw hawkw added area: tools & build Related to host developer tools, including tracing, Crowtty and build processes area: protocols Related to communication protocols, including SerMux and Traceproto. labels Jul 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area: protocols Related to communication protocols, including SerMux and Traceproto. area: tools & build Related to host developer tools, including tracing, Crowtty and build processes kind: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jamesmunns @hawkw