Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tower: prepare to release v0.4.5 #558

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 10, 2021
Merged

tower: prepare to release v0.4.5 #558

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 10, 2021

Conversation

davidpdrsn
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@hawkw
Copy link
Member

hawkw commented Feb 10, 2021

Mind if we also try to get #557 in? Should be merged shortly.

@davidpdrsn
Copy link
Member Author

Sure thing. I'll be going to bed in ~1 hour so feel free to take over this PR.


### Fixed

- **util**: Make combinators implement `Debug` in more cases. ([#552])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can we clarify "in more cases"? specifically, I think this is that the Debug impl doesn't require the closure/function to be Debug...and in practice, i think these types will never implement Debug....

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

- **util**: Add `option_layer` to convert an `Option<Layer>` into a `Layer`. ([#555])
- **builder**: Add `ServiceBuilder::option_layer` to optionally add a layer. ([#555])
- **steer**: `Steer` now implements `Clone
- **make**: Added `Shared` which lets you implement `MakeService` by cloning a
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: the tense here is inconsistent with the other entries ("Added ..." rather than "Add ..."). We should probably try to keep that consistent across releases, but let's at least keep it consistent here?

(it's entirely possible that i'm the only person in the world who cares about this, sorry!)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its all about the little things 😊

@hawkw
Copy link
Member

hawkw commented Feb 10, 2021

@davidpdrsn if you don't mind rebasing onto master to pick up #557, I think we'll be good to go!

Copy link
Member

@hawkw hawkw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lovely! looks good to merge pending CI

@davidpdrsn davidpdrsn merged commit ba3d431 into master Feb 10, 2021
@davidpdrsn davidpdrsn deleted the david/0.4.5 branch February 10, 2021 23:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants