treehouses checksignal

[i5o]

this pull requests replaces #58 by @TerrenceEJ
and by #58 (comment)
now this is the output

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ treehouses checksignal
Signal level=-47  
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ 

[TerrenceEJ]

Nice :)

[xyb994]

I wonder if we should keep dBm in the output. Still might want to explain what the numbers means somewhere.

[i5o]

@TerrenceEJ that's up to you, do you need dBm in the app, or do you remove it on your code?

[TerrenceEJ]

If you could change it to use dbm, that would be great

…

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 6:39 PM Ignacio Rodríguez ***@***.***> wrote: @TerrenceEJ <https://github.com/TerrenceEJ> that's up to you, do you need dBm in the app, or do you remove it on your code? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#72 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXaLe0_dgHqbmLnbj-5uL1T1oh2RyTaNks5t4cKhgaJpZM4UUMYD> .

[i5o]

Done

[dogi]

checksignal is maybe not the best word ....

[dogi]

• needs to rebased ;)
• new command name wifidbm or wifistrength ... like later one more ;)
• extented help is missing