Fix replace extension

[Romakita]

Information

Prepare code to ESM full

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.3
• Run: Sat Jun 01 2024 15:23:43 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	33010.2	29.78	5.89
tsed-koa	7.70.2	✓	11592.8	85.47	9.82
express	4.19.2	✓	10221.5	97.00	1.82
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9715.0	101.92	2.21
nest	8.4.3	✓	9326.4	106.29	2.24
tsed-express	7.70.2	✓	8505.5	116.59	1.56
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5556.0	178.10	0.99
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.3
• Run: Sat Jun 01 2024 16:20:32 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	33698.2	29.14	6.01
tsed-koa	7.70.2	✓	11900.0	83.31	10.08
express	4.19.2	✓	10883.2	91.07	1.94
nest	8.4.3	✓	9925.6	99.89	2.39
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9644.2	102.81	2.20
tsed-express	7.70.2	✓	8687.5	114.13	1.59
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5683.8	174.16	1.01
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.3
• Run: Sat Jun 01 2024 16:32:21 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	33174.4	29.62	5.92
tsed-koa	7.70.2	✓	11598.4	85.40	9.82
express	4.19.2	✓	10150.4	97.74	1.81
nest	8.4.3	✓	9499.1	104.36	2.28
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9435.5	104.98	2.15
tsed-express	7.70.2	✓	8578.9	115.36	1.57
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5623.1	176.09	1.00
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.3
• Run: Sat Jun 01 2024 16:48:41 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	32993.6	29.78	5.88
tsed-koa	7.70.2	✓	11641.1	85.12	9.86
express	4.19.2	✓	10265.8	96.62	1.83
nest	8.4.3	✓	9525.5	103.89	2.29
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9169.8	107.85	2.09
tsed-express	7.70.2	✓	8207.0	120.83	1.50
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5546.4	178.35	0.99
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.3
• Run: Sat Jun 01 2024 17:04:43 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	34066.2	28.83	6.07
tsed-koa	7.70.2	✓	12025.8	82.36	10.19
express	4.19.2	✓	10830.9	91.55	1.93
nest	8.4.3	✓	10015.1	98.83	2.41
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9823.5	100.89	2.24
tsed-express	7.70.2	✓	8668.9	114.38	1.59
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5681.6	174.19	1.01
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.3
• Run: Sat Jun 01 2024 17:06:25 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	34624.7	28.36	6.17
tsed-koa	7.70.2	✓	12153.1	81.51	10.29
express	4.19.2	✓	10608.4	93.46	1.89
nest	8.4.3	✓	9953.6	99.60	2.39
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9601.4	103.24	2.19
tsed-express	7.70.2	✓	8824.2	112.30	1.62
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5570.0	177.70	0.99
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[Romakita]

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.71.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• v7.71.0
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀