React in library name?

[viskin]

It seems that the library is completely free from being dependent on react. It can be used with say angular2+redux.
Any reason why it was named so?

[tshaddix]

Yep! When it was first created, the library implemented component-connecting functions similar to react-redux. It only took a day or two to realize that using a ProxyStore would allow users to take advantage of react bindings using existing react libraries, so I switched to that approach.

The name is a remnant of the original solution, and nothing more. You could easily use this with any front-end component library, as it's only focus is making chrome extensions "redux enabled".

What do you suggest? Renaming?

[viskin]

Oh, OK.
I don't think renaming is a good thing to do. But I'm not sure. People already know your library by its name...
I think that sure thing to do is stating in README that it can work with react, angular or any other library. So folks that use angular2 will not be frightened to try it.

[tshaddix]

Great idea! I'll mark this as a suggestion.