Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug fix modelhelper for intertemporal case #261

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 12, 2020
Merged

Conversation

lodersky
Copy link
Contributor

With this fix urbs functions correctly, but the results can differ from the reality.
Example:

  • a process installed in 2020
  • having a lifetime of 5 years
  • stf of the model also has the years 2025 and 2030
    The model has to build a new process for 2030, but can use the process in 2025 and the years till 2030.

lodersky added 7 commits November 25, 2019 17:02
* change op_pro_tuples creation
* change inst_pro_tuples creation
* Change definition of op_pro_tuples (line 185) to middle of two support years
* Change definition of inst_pro_tuples (line 212) to middle of two support years
* model.py: changing cost/co2 limit/budget definition
* validation.py: check for cost/co2 limit/budget, add if missing
* runfunctions.py: saving lp-file in result folder
@sonercandas sonercandas merged commit ad8712e into tum-ens:master May 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants