Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade scalacheck #431

Conversation

MansurAshraf
Copy link
Contributor

Bringing it to the same version as used internally

@MansurAshraf
Copy link
Contributor Author

Following test is failing after the upgrade

[info] - map int double scaling *** FAILED ***
[info]   GeneratorDrivenPropertyCheckFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
[info]    (CheckProperties.scala:12)
[info]     Falsified after 1 successful property evaluations.
[info]     Location: (CheckProperties.scala:12)
[info]     Occurred when passed generated values (
[info]       arg0 = Map(1039802616 -> 4.4384666053440264E176),
[info]       arg1 = 4.151844009363087E158,
[info]       arg2 = 7.086895641185986E-105
[info]     )

@ianoc ianoc closed this Aug 4, 2015
@ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

ianoc commented Aug 4, 2015

Sorry my bad, git foo on cmd line broke stuff and closed all of these

@ianoc ianoc reopened this Aug 4, 2015
@DanielleSucher
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like map int double scaling now passes and instead we've moved onto a different failure:

[info] - should correctly downsize sparse HLL *** FAILED ***
[info]   0.09900977968481595 was not less than 0.056875 (HyperLogLogTest.scala:127)

@ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

ianoc commented Aug 5, 2015

This branch seems old @DanielleSucher, you want to take this effort over in a new PR maybe?

-- That test btw is probabilistic so can just fail with a false positive so unless it fails always its probably not broken

@DanielleSucher
Copy link
Collaborator

@ianoc - Sure, though I was actually thinking of going back and triaging (and seeing which could be closed of) a bunch of old branches here, too.

(Hopefully #478 will help re the probabilistic tests!)

@DanielleSucher
Copy link
Collaborator

@ianoc Let's close this one now ^^

@ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

ianoc commented Aug 12, 2015

Good call, closed

@ianoc ianoc closed this Aug 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants