Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add consistency laws for .combineAll and .combineAllOption. #1347

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 1, 2016

Conversation

non
Copy link
Contributor

@non non commented Sep 1, 2016

These tests will catch sitautions where the optimized methods are
broken (i.e. become inconsistent with the behavior of .combine).
These tests caught an issue with Monoid[Map[K, V]].combineAll, which
was broken.

Fixes #1346.

These tests will catch sitautions where the optimized methods are
broken (i.e. become inconsistent with the behavior of .combine).
These tests caught an issue with Monoid[Map[K, V]].combineAll, which
was broken.

Fixes typelevel#1346.
@non non added the in progress label Sep 1, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 91.73% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1347 into master will increase coverage by 0.34%

@@             master      #1347   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           237        237          
  Lines          3567       3571     +4   
  Methods        3502       3505     +3   
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches         64         65     +1   
==========================================
+ Hits           3260       3276    +16   
+ Misses          307        295    -12   
  Partials          0          0          

Sunburst

Powered by Codecov. Last update 449e0b0...ba1e07e

@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@non non merged commit 3954ce7 into typelevel:master Sep 1, 2016
@non non removed the in progress label Sep 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants