Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ordering for type classes #1432

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 26, 2016
Merged

Ordering for type classes #1432

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 26, 2016

Conversation

juanpedromoreno
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1420

It's just an skeleton for the new typeclasses organization. For example, Foldable, MonadCombine, MonadFilter, MonoidK, SemigroupK and Show are pending to be placed in its own "track".

BTW, the menu.yml defines also the menu for the Data Types section. Also, the 0.3.0 version of the sbt-microsites is mandatory since we've changed the way we generate the menu, trying to make it more powerful.

Please, @adelbertc @tpolecat take a look when you have a chance. Thanks!

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 26, 2016

Current coverage is 92.20% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1432 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #1432   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           242        242          
  Lines          3606       3606          
  Methods        3537       3537          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches         69         69          
==========================================
  Hits           3325       3325          
  Misses          281        281          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 35c2bc0...1e0ce8b

@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, thanks so much @juanpedromoreno ! This LGTM for a starting point, we can add/organize pages pretty easily from here it looks like. 👍 from me.

@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Oct 26, 2016

agreed, thanks for this! 👍

@non non merged commit 25e9628 into typelevel:master Oct 26, 2016
@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to start going through each "track" and revamping our current docs to better reflect the ordering. Hurrah pretty docs!

@adelbertc adelbertc mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2016
18 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants