Rework Order derivation #153
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Make it more consistent with other derivations
* Add more tests and remove `LargeX` compile test:
Testing compile time performance is better done in a benchmark.
* Drop derivation for coproducts with more than one case:
It's ambiguous and inconsistent with `PartialOrder` derivation.
18 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make it more consistent with other derivations
Add more tests and remove
LargeXcompile test:Testing compile time performance is better done in a benchmark.
Drop derivation for coproducts with more than one case:
It's ambiguous and inconsistent with
PartialOrderderivation.