Verify adblock rules not accepted

[uazo]

Discussed in #1197

^{Originally posted by Rajraimatrix June 8, 2024}
adblocker is working fine with some additional filters but i was unable to block pop up on many sites.

[frank-owen]

I've noticed quite a few sites that have pop up elements that are removed with an annoyances filter when using uBO (Firefox)/adblock-rust (Brave) which Cromite doesn't remove. I assumed this was a limitation of Adblock Plus. This would be a big improvement for Cromite as the better adblocking capabilities is the sole reason I use Firefox and Brave rather than Cromite.

[uazo]

I assumed this was a limitation of Adblock Plus

no, the mistake is mine, see #1197 (comment)

[ruboard]

A very simple example of a filter not working imginn.com##.Block-sulvo (Custom Rules)

Details

https://imginn.Com/taylorswift/

ps worked on bromite!

[uazo]

@ruboard rule is wrong, the correct one is

imginn.com##.block-h12

[uazo]

[10980:20464:0611/114112.118:INFO:flatbuffer_converter.cc(128)] [eyeo] Invalid url filter: ||html-load.cc^$document,popup
[10980:20464:0611/114112.118:INFO:url_filter.cc(129)] [eyeo] Exception options can only be used with allowing filters
[10980:20464:0611/114112.118:INFO:flatbuffer_converter.cc(128)] [eyeo] Invalid url filter: ||html-load.com^$document,popup

It looks like an upstream error.
in https://gitlab.com/eyeo/adblockplus/chromium-sdk/-/blob/eyeo-126-dev/components/adblock/core/converter/parser/url_filter_options.cc?ref_type=heads#L219 from what I understand, exceptions begin with ~, but that doesn't seem to be the case in the code.

[uazo]

see #560 (comment)