Execute Process Request crashes UE4.24.1

[erpy]

Execute Process Request crashes Editor everytime. Verify peer is disabled in project config.

[ufna]

Hi @erpy ,

What's inside Construct Json Request function? It's not the one from VaRest.

[erpy]

Hi @ufna,
it's a constructor that also sets up the json object for the request.
I couldn't find examples for how to make a request, so I went for deductive usage... :)

[erpy]

That also crashes with "Process URL" other than "Execute Process Request"

[ufna]

What is in crash log?

[erpy]

`Unhandled Exception: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION reading address 0x00000038

UE4Editor_VaRest!UVaRestRequestJSON::ProcessRequest() [d:\build++portal+dev-marketplace+full\sync\localbuilds\plugintemp\hostproject\plugins\varest\source\varest\private\varestrequestjson.cpp:410]
UE4Editor_VaRest!UVaRestRequestJSON::execProcessURL() [d:\build++portal+dev-marketplace+full\sync\localbuilds\plugintemp\hostproject\plugins\varest\source\varest\public\varestrequestjson.h:82]`

[erpy]

[2020.01.28-09.13.15:148][797]LogScript: Warning: Accessed None trying to read property CallFunc_constructJsonRequest_jsonObj
[2020.01.28-09.13.15:148][797]LogScript: Warning: Accessed None trying to read property CallFunc_constructJsonRequest_jsonObj

[erpy]

Looking at the logs now, and it looks like those objects are possibly null...
I've stepped many times through it... the Request and Json objects both appear to be there when debugging in Blueprint editor.

[ufna]

I'm not sure why, but your Construct Json Request function works not as it should. It should be replaced for now with original one.

[erpy]

I just tried a vanilla request, only using VaRest functions... same result.

[erpy]

Ok, I got it working. The Json object for the request was not "constructed" using the "ConstructJSON" function, but only referencing a VaRest Json Object variable in the blueprint.
It would be nice if this would raise an error in the Blueprint rather than crashing the Editor ?

Btw, thanks for your time! I appreciate.

[ufna]

Thanks for pointing this, minor improvement is here :)