Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PL/HT] Fix computation of darcy velocity. #2124

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 24, 2018

Conversation

TomFischer
Copy link
Member

Corrected access to the local pressure and temperature variables.

Fixes issue #2054.

Copy link
Member

@endJunction endJunction left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs a ctest catching this...
Can be an existing test, but check for velocity explicitly.

Copy link
Member

@wenqing wenqing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍
I have another PR for the staggered scheme too.

@TomFischer
Copy link
Member Author

Since the HT process is not tested for some time and the current results differ from the expected values I'll add more ctest to ensure the process will compute correct results.

@wenqing Is your PR for the staggered scheme handling the Darcy velocity? Then maybe we can merge our works?

@wenqing
Copy link
Member

wenqing commented May 18, 2018

@TomFischer Yes, it is. My PR is for the staggered scheme handling the Darcy velocity. Therefore, my PR should not have the same changes as that in this PR. Should I re-sent this PR to your branch for this PR?

@TomFischer
Copy link
Member Author

@wenqing I think we can let them as separate PRs.

Also relax the tolerance for temperature in the test.
@TomFischer TomFischer merged commit 10da2ba into ufz:master May 24, 2018
@TomFischer TomFischer deleted the HTFixDarcyVelocity branch May 24, 2018 09:53
@ogsbot
Copy link
Member

ogsbot commented Jun 19, 2020

OpenGeoSys development has been moved to GitLab.

See this pull request on GitLab.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants